rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Cannabis Use Rose Through Age 22 and Stayed Stable in Washington State After Legalization

Cross SectionalStrong evidence
The takeaway

Among over 15,000 young adults in Washington state, cannabis use increased from ages 18-22 and plateaued through 26, with social norms and low perceived harm most consistently driving use.

Prevention professionals targeting young adults and policymakers evaluating post-legalization use trends.

Use peaked at age 22 and plateaued through age 26

What the researchers found

Cannabis use prevalence increased from ages 18-22 and remained relatively stable through age 26. Ease of access, social norms, and low perceived harm were associated with use, but the strength of these associations varied by age. Injunctive norms (perceptions of use acceptability) and low perceived psychological harm were the most consistent predictors across the full age range.

Why it matters

Understanding which risk factors matter most at different ages can help target prevention efforts. The finding that perceived acceptability drives use well into the mid-20s, and that perceived psychological harm becomes more influential with age, suggests that prevention messaging should evolve as young adults mature.

The numbers in context

N = 15,251. Mean age 22.02. 68% female. Use increased ages 18-22, stable through 26. Injunctive norms rose substantially through age 23, then decreased. Ease of access and descriptive norms had strongest associations around age 18. Low perceived physical harm associations got somewhat stronger with age.

How the study worked

Repeated cross-sectional data from 15,251 young adults (mean age 22, 68% female) in the Washington Young Adult Health Survey from 2015-2022 (post-legalization). Logistic time-varying effect models examined age-varying associations between risk factors and cannabis use (any and frequent past-month use).

What this study cannot tell us

Repeated cross-sectional design means different individuals were surveyed at different ages, not the same people tracked over time. Washington-specific findings may not apply to states with different legal frameworks. Self-report measures may undercount actual use.

How to read the evidence

Large statewide survey with over 15,000 respondents and sophisticated age-varying models. Strong cross-sectional evidence, though not longitudinal.

When this study was published

Published in 2025 with data from 2015-2022.

The bigger picture

Washington was among the first states to legalize recreational cannabis. This study captures how use patterns develop in a fully legal environment, showing that even with easy access, use peaks in the early 20s and does not continue climbing through the mid-20s.

Questions still open

  • Would the age plateau pattern differ in states where cannabis remains illegal? Can targeted messaging about psychological harms effectively reduce use in mid-20s adults?

Common questions

Does cannabis use keep increasing after the early 20s?
Not in this study. Use prevalence rose from 18-22 and then stayed relatively stable through age 26 in Washington state, suggesting a natural plateau in the early-to-mid 20s.
What matters more for preventing use: access or attitudes?
Both matter, but social norms and perceived harm had more consistent associations with use across the full age range than ease of access, which was most influential around age 18.

Read the original research

Age-Varying Patterns of Cannabis Use, Related Risk Factors, and their Associations among Young Adults in the Context of Legalized Nonmedical Cannabis.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 26(5), 773-784

Citation

Martinez, Griselda; Calhoun, Brian H; Fleming, Charles B; Linden-Carmichael, Ashley N; Acolin, Jessica; Rhew, Isaac C; Kilmer, Jason R; Larimer, Mary E; Guttmannova, Katarina. (2025). Age-Varying Patterns of Cannabis Use, Related Risk Factors, and their Associations among Young Adults in the Context of Legalized Nonmedical Cannabis.. Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 26(5), 773-784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-025-01803-0

Explore the wider topic