A review of international survey data found synthetic cannabinoid use prevalence of 0.2-4% in the general population, peaking in late teens/early twenties, with most users trying it only a few times out of curiosity.
Read this if you want an evidence-based perspective on how common synthetic cannabinoid (Spice) use actually is.
0.2-4% lifetime prevalence; most users try Spice only a few times
What the researchers found
This review compiled data from nationally and regionally representative surveys worldwide to characterize synthetic cannabinoid (Spice) use patterns.
Lifetime prevalence in the general population ranged from 0.2% to 4%. Use peaked in the late teens and early twenties and declined with age. Users were predominantly male. Limited longitudinal data suggested use was declining from its peak.
Most Spice users reported trying the substance only a small number of times, and sustained regular use was uncommon. The most frequently cited motivation was curiosity. Spice users almost universally reported extensive histories of using other substances, suggesting they are a subset of broader polysubstance users rather than a distinct population.
Interestingly, people consistently overestimated how common Spice use was among their peers, with perceived use rates significantly exceeding actual use.
Why it matters
This review provides much-needed context to the synthetic cannabinoid concern. While individual cases can be severe, population-level data shows use is generally uncommon, experimental, and transient. The finding that people overestimate peer use suggests media coverage may be amplifying perceived prevalence beyond reality.
The numbers in context
Lifetime prevalence: 0.2-4% in general population. Peak use: late teens/early twenties. Most users: male, tried only a few times. Primary motivation: curiosity. Users overestimate peer use. Most Spice users have extensive other substance use histories.
How the study worked
Literature review of national and international organizations and peer-reviewed publications reporting synthetic cannabinoid use in non-clinical populations. Focused on nationally and regionally representative surveys to establish population-level prevalence.
What this study cannot tell us
Survey data may undercount Spice use. Rapid evolution of synthetic cannabinoid products makes it difficult to track specific compounds. Some surveys grouped synthetic cannabinoids with other substances. Longitudinal data was limited.
How to read the evidence
Review of nationally representative surveys providing robust population-level data, though limited by varying methodologies across surveys.
When this study was published
Published in 2016. The synthetic cannabinoid market has continued to evolve with new compounds and shifting use patterns.
The bigger picture
While synthetic cannabinoids pose real risks (as documented in clinical case reports and toxicology studies), this population-level view suggests the "Spice epidemic" framing may overstate the scope of the problem. Public health responses should be proportionate to actual prevalence rather than perceived prevalence.
Questions still open
- Has Spice use continued to decline since this review? Why do people overestimate peer use of synthetic cannabinoids? Would correcting misperceptions of peer use reduce experimentation?
Common questions
How common is Spice use?
Why do people try synthetic cannabinoids?
Read the original research
International trends in spice use: Prevalence, motivation for use, relationship to other substances, and perception of use and safety for synthetic cannabinoids.
Brain research bulletin, 126(Pt 1), 8-28
Citation
Loeffler, George; Delaney, Eileen; Hann, Michael. (2016). International trends in spice use: Prevalence, motivation for use, relationship to other substances, and perception of use and safety for synthetic cannabinoids.. Brain research bulletin, 126(Pt 1), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.04.013
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?