A case report described a 16-year-old boy who developed a perforated duodenal ulcer after 3 years of regular synthetic cannabinoid ("bonsai") use, requiring emergency surgery.
Emergency clinicians and parents concerned about the gastrointestinal effects of synthetic cannabinoids.
3 years of synthetic cannabinoid use preceded life-threatening duodenal perforation
What the researchers found
This case report described a 16-year-old male who presented to the emergency department with abdominal distension, pain, and bilious vomiting. He had been regularly using synthetic cannabinoids ("bonsai") for 3 years.
Imaging revealed free air under the diaphragm, indicating perforation. Emergency surgery (laparotomy) found a perforation in the first part of the duodenum. Surgical repair with an omental patch (Graham patch) was successful, and the patient recovered without complications.
The authors attributed the peptic ulcer disease and perforation to the chronic effects of synthetic cannabinoids on gastric secretion and gastric emptying, noting that this is a rarely recognized complication.
Why it matters
Gastrointestinal perforation is a life-threatening complication that is not typically associated with substance use in adolescents. This case highlights that chronic synthetic cannabinoid use can produce serious gastrointestinal complications beyond the better-known CHS.
The numbers in context
Patient age: 16. Duration of synthetic cannabinoid use: 3 years. Perforation location: first part of duodenum. Repair: Graham patch. Outcome: uncomplicated recovery.
How the study worked
Single case report with clinical description, imaging findings, surgical intervention, and postoperative follow-up.
What this study cannot tell us
A single case report cannot establish a causal relationship between synthetic cannabinoid use and duodenal perforation. The patient may have had other risk factors for peptic ulcer disease. The specific synthetic cannabinoid compounds used were not identified.
How to read the evidence
This is a single case report providing anecdotal evidence of a possible association between synthetic cannabinoid use and gastrointestinal perforation.
When this study was published
Published in 2016. Awareness of synthetic cannabinoid gastrointestinal effects has grown since then.
The bigger picture
This case adds gastrointestinal perforation to the growing list of serious adverse effects from chronic synthetic cannabinoid use. Emergency clinicians encountering unexplained peptic ulcer disease in adolescents should consider substance use, particularly synthetic cannabinoids, as a possible contributing factor.
Questions still open
- How common are gastrointestinal complications from chronic synthetic cannabinoid use? Do natural cannabis products carry the same gastrointestinal risk?
Common questions
Can synthetic cannabis cause stomach problems?
Is this the same risk with natural cannabis?
Read the original research
Unusual side effect of cannabis use: acute abdomen due to duodenal perforation.
International journal of emergency medicine, 9(1), 18
Citation
Buyukbese Sarsu, Sevgi. (2016). Unusual side effect of cannabis use: acute abdomen due to duodenal perforation.. International journal of emergency medicine, 9(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-016-0114-7
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?