Compared to cannabis, synthetic cannabinoids are associated with faster development of dependence, more severe psychiatric risks, complex withdrawal including seizures, and serious physical effects including cardiotoxicity and death.
People interested in synthetic cannabinoid risks, clinicians, and anyone comparing synthetic versus natural cannabis.
Synthetic cannabinoids: faster dependence, seizure-risk withdrawal, cardiotoxicity, and death
What the researchers found
Synthetic cannabinoid use is associated with more rapid development of dependence than cannabis, increased psychiatric risks, complex withdrawal syndromes, and serious physical adverse effects including seizures, cardiotoxicity, and death, suggesting a need for more intensive clinical management.
Why it matters
Synthetic cannabinoids are often perceived as legal or safer alternatives to cannabis, but the clinical reality is much more dangerous. Psychiatrists encountering these patients need to know that standard cannabis management protocols are insufficient.
The numbers in context
Compared to cannabis: more rapid dependence development, increased psychiatric risks, complex withdrawal with seizures, cardiotoxicity, and deaths. Management requires more intensive approaches than for natural cannabis.
How the study worked
Literature review searching MEDLINE and Embase for articles of all methodological designs published through June 2018, focusing on physical and psychiatric adverse effects of chronic synthetic cannabinoid use and clinical management strategies.
What this study cannot tell us
Literature review rather than systematic review. Synthetic cannabinoids are a diverse group of chemicals; findings may not apply equally to all compounds. Many reports are case-based. Long-term outcome data are limited.
How to read the evidence
Moderate: clinical review covering available evidence through 2018, though much is from case reports and small studies.
When this study was published
Published in 2019.
The bigger picture
The synthetic cannabinoid market continues to evolve faster than research can keep up. Clinicians in mental health settings are increasingly encountering these patients and need practical guidance, which this review provides alongside the clinical evidence.
Questions still open
- Are specific synthetic cannabinoid compounds more dangerous than others? Could pharmacological interventions improve withdrawal outcomes? What is the optimal monitoring period for patients presenting with synthetic cannabinoid-related psychiatric symptoms?
Common questions
How are synthetic cannabinoids different from natural cannabis?
Can synthetic cannabinoid withdrawal be dangerous?
Read the original research
Synthetic cannabinoid use disorder: an update for general psychiatrists.
Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 27(3), 279-283
Citation
Grigg, Jasmin; Manning, Victoria; Arunogiri, Shalini; Lubman, Dan I. (2019). Synthetic cannabinoid use disorder: an update for general psychiatrists.. Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists, 27(3), 279-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1039856218822749
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?