Four Distinct Spending and Use Profiles Emerge Among Young Adult Cannabis Consumers

Young adult cannabis users fell into four distinct profiles based on spending, price sensitivity, and product preferences, with higher-spending groups showing more problematic use.

Cui, Yuxian et al.·Addictive behaviors·2025·Moderate EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-06276Cross SectionalModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Latent class analysis identified four profiles: price-insensitive low-spend (36%), high-spend heavy users (32%), moderate-spend oil/other users (24%), and price-sensitive high-spend mixed users (8%). All groups except the low-spend group showed higher problematic use.

Key Numbers

Class 1: 36.1% (price-insensitive, low-spend). Class 2: 31.9% (high-spend, high-frequency). Class 3: 24.1% (moderate-spend, oil/other). Class 4: 7.9% (price-sensitive, high-spend, mixed).

How They Did This

Survey of 1,359 US young adults reporting past-month cannabis use (mean age 26.95). Latent class analysis used cost perception, spending, use frequency, and product type.

Why This Research Matters

Understanding how cannabis spending and use patterns cluster helps identify which consumer profiles may be at greatest risk for problematic use.

The Bigger Picture

The link between higher spending and problematic use echoes patterns seen with alcohol.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cross-sectional design. Self-reported spending may be inaccurate. Convenience sample.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would price-based policies reduce problematic cannabis use?
  • ?Do spending profiles change over time?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Higher-spending profiles showed significantly more problematic use
Evidence Grade:
Large cross-sectional survey with latent class analysis; moderate because of strong methodology but cross-sectional design.
Study Age:
2025 publication using 2024 survey data
Original Title:
Profiles of cannabis use and expense-related factors among US young adults.
Published In:
Addictive behaviors, 170, 108428 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06276

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

What does "problematic use" mean in this context?

Validated scales assessing whether cannabis use is causing difficulties in daily life, relationships, or responsibilities.

Does spending more on cannabis mean someone has a problem?

Not necessarily. But in this study, higher-spending groups were statistically more likely to score higher on measures of problematic use.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06276·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06276

APA

Cui, Yuxian; McCready, Darcey M; Romm, Katelyn F; LoParco, Cassidy R; Speer, Morgan; Chakraborty, Rishika; Williams, Jessica; Cavazos-Rehg, Patricia A; Wang, Yan; Yang, Y Tony; Berg, Carla J. (2025). Profiles of cannabis use and expense-related factors among US young adults.. Addictive behaviors, 170, 108428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108428

MLA

Cui, Yuxian, et al. "Profiles of cannabis use and expense-related factors among US young adults.." Addictive behaviors, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108428

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Profiles of cannabis use and expense-related factors among U..." RTHC-06276. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/cui-2025-profiles-of-cannabis-use

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.