Among 80 adolescents in substance treatment, 51% used both synthetic and natural marijuana, primarily motivated by low cost and avoiding drug test detection, despite recognizing the medical risks.
Parents, school administrators, adolescent treatment providers, juvenile justice professionals
Cost and drug test avoidance top motivators
What the researchers found
Of 80 adolescents, 49% used natural marijuana only and 51% used both synthetic and natural. Top reasons for synthetic use: low cost and reduced drug test detection risk. Dual users had higher externalizing problems (p=0.024) and peer substance use (p=0.009) but no difference in psychotic symptoms. Synthetic use heightened perceived medical risks of natural marijuana.
Why it matters
Understanding why adolescents choose synthetic cannabinoids over natural marijuana can inform prevention strategies. The finding that drug test avoidance is a key motivator suggests testing policies may paradoxically push some youth toward more dangerous products.
The numbers in context
80 adolescents (71% male, 53% Caucasian, ages 14-18). 51% dual users. Higher externalizing problems in dual users (p=0.024). Higher peer substance use (p=0.009). Persecutory ideation correlated with natural marijuana frequency (p=0.04).
How the study worked
Convenience sample of 80 adolescents (ages 14-18) receiving substance use treatment, surveyed between April 2016-May 2018. Assessed with Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire and CAPE-Positive Scale for psychosis symptoms.
What this study cannot tell us
Small convenience sample from a single treatment center. Adolescents already in treatment may differ from the general population. Self-reported use. Cross-sectional design. No biochemical verification.
How to read the evidence
Small convenience sample from a treatment population provides limited generalizability despite relevant findings.
When this study was published
2024 publication of 2016-2018 survey data from adolescent treatment patients
The bigger picture
The irony that drug testing intended to deter substance use may drive adolescents toward synthetic cannabinoids, which are more dangerous and harder to detect, highlights unintended consequences of punitive drug policies in schools and juvenile justice.
Questions still open
- Would reducing punitive drug testing in schools decrease synthetic cannabinoid use? Do the externalizing behavior differences precede or result from synthetic use?
Common questions
Why do teens use synthetic marijuana?
Is synthetic marijuana more dangerous than natural?
Read the original research
Synthetic Marijuana: Assessment of Usage, Motivation and Associated Risks in Adolescent Substance Users.
Substance use : research and treatment, 18, 29768357241254258
Citation
Baweja, Raman; Mills-Huffnagle, Sara; Jernigan, Amanda; Chongtham, Nungshitombi; Waschbusch, Daniel; Waxmonsky, James G. (2024). Synthetic Marijuana: Assessment of Usage, Motivation and Associated Risks in Adolescent Substance Users.. Substance use : research and treatment, 18, 29768357241254258. https://doi.org/10.1177/29768357241254258
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?