rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Cannabis May Change How Genes Are Expressed, and These Changes Could Pass to the Next Generation

ReviewModerate evidence
The takeaway

A review of emerging evidence found that cannabis exposure can alter epigenetic marks (chemical modifications that control gene expression) in the brain and body, with some changes potentially transmitted to offspring.

Read this if you want to understand how cannabis might affect gene expression beyond just being in your system.

Cannabis-induced epigenetic changes were found in both brain tissue and peripheral cells, with some evidence of intergenerational transmission.

The Backstory

What if your cannabis use could affect your children — not through secondhand smoke or parenting behavior, but through heritable changes to your DNA that alter gene expression in the next generation? Henrietta Szutorisz and Yasmin Hurd's 2016 review in Biological Psychiatry compiled evidence for exactly that scenario. And the data, while preliminary, is unsettling enough that it deserves serious attention.

The mechanism is epigenetics — changes to how genes are expressed without altering the DNA sequence itself. Think of it as annotations on top of the genetic code: chemical marks that tell genes to turn on or off, louder or quieter. These marks can be modified by environmental exposures. And some of those modifications, it turns out, can be passed from parent to offspring through sperm and eggs.

What Epigenetics Means for Cannabis

Biological Mechanism

How THC May Alter Gene Expression Across Generations

1
▼

THC activates CB1 receptors

In the brain, THC engages the endocannabinoid system — but cannabinoid receptors are also present in reproductive tissues, including the testes

2
▼

DNA methylation changes

THC exposure alters the pattern of methyl groups on DNA, particularly at CpG sites near gene promoters. These marks control whether a gene is active or silent.

3
▼

Histone modifications shift

THC changes histone methylation patterns — particularly H3K4me3 (activating) and H3K9me2 (silencing) — creating persistent changes in gene accessibility

4
▼

Sperm epigenome is altered

These epigenetic marks accumulate in sperm cells, surviving the partial epigenetic reprogramming that occurs during fertilization

5
▼

Offspring inherit modified marks

The next generation develops with altered gene expression patterns in reward-related brain circuits — despite never being directly exposed to THC

6

Behavioral consequences emerge

Animal offspring of THC-exposed parents show altered drug-seeking behavior, changes in dopamine and glutamate signaling, and modified stress responses

Szutorisz & Hurd (2016), Biol Psychiatry 79(7):586-594

The key insight is that epigenetic marks aren't just a response to THC — they can persist after the drug is gone and potentially transmit to offspring. This is fundamentally different from genetic inheritance: your DNA sequence doesn't change. But the instructions for reading that sequence do.

The Animal Evidence

Hurd's lab at Mount Sinai (the same group behind the CBD-for-heroin-craving trial) produced some of the most striking findings:

Epigenetic Effects

THC Exposure Effects on Offspring (Animal Models)

Increased

Heroin self-administration

in offspring of THC-exposed parents

Altered

Dopamine D2 receptor expression

decreased Drd2 mRNA in nucleus accumbens

Dlg4/PSD-95

Key gene affected

encodes a synaptic scaffolding protein critical for learning

H3K9me2

Repressive histone mark

persistently increased in reward circuits

Szutorisz & Hurd (2016); Watson et al. (2015)

In rats, parental THC exposure before mating produced offspring with:

  • Increased vulnerability to opioids — offspring self-administered more heroin and showed enhanced drug-seeking behavior, despite never being exposed to THC or opioids themselves
  • Altered gene expression in reward circuits — changes in dopamine, glutamate, and cannabinoid receptor genes in the striatum
  • DNA methylation disturbances — centered on the Dlg4 gene, which encodes PSD-95, a critical scaffolding protein at excitatory synapses. PSD-95 regulates NMDA receptor function and dopamine-glutamate interactions — pathways central to addiction and reward processing
  • Stereotyped withdrawal behaviors — enhanced sensitivity to opioid withdrawal effects

Prenatal THC exposure (giving THC to pregnant animals) produced a related but distinct pattern: decreased dopamine D2 receptor expression in the nucleus accumbens, associated with specific histone modifications (reduced H3K4me3, increased H3K9me2). Adolescent THC exposure increased proenkephalin gene expression through persistent H3K9me3 repressive marks.

The consistent finding across models: THC exposure didn't just change the exposed animal's brain. It changed the epigenetic programming that would be inherited by the next generation — and the behavioral changes in offspring clustered around reward processing and drug vulnerability.

The Human Data

Human evidence is more limited but directional. Studies found that:

  • Cannabis-using individuals with schizophrenia showed increased CB1 receptor expression that inversely correlated with CNR1 promoter methylation — meaning the epigenetic marks on the gene controlling CB1 receptors were altered
  • Adolescents with specific COMT gene methylation patterns had different cannabis dependence risk profiles
  • Peripheral blood methylation patterns reflected frequency of cannabis use
The debate
Epigenetic effects of cannabis may transmit to offspring through sperm

Supporting arguments

  • Animal models consistently show behavioral changes in offspring of THC-exposed parents
  • Specific epigenetic mechanisms identified: DNA methylation and histone modification at identified genes
  • Effects are biologically plausible — CB1 receptors are present in reproductive tissues
  • Human studies show cannabis-related methylation changes in peripheral tissues
  • Consistent with known epigenetic inheritance in other environmental exposures (diet, stress, toxins)

Limitations and counterarguments

  • Most evidence comes from animal models — human transgenerational epigenetic inheritance is poorly established for any exposure
  • Animal studies typically use higher THC doses relative to body weight than human use
  • Epigenetic reprogramming during fertilization and early development normally erases most parental marks — the extent of 'escape' from this reprogramming is debated
  • Human confounders (lifestyle, nutrition, other substance use, socioeconomic factors) are difficult to separate from cannabis-specific epigenetic effects
  • True transgenerational effects (persisting beyond the F1 generation) have not been demonstrated for cannabis

Szutorisz & Hurd (2016); Watson et al. (2015); Murphy et al. (2018)

What This Means — And What It Doesn't

This is among the most provocative findings in cannabis research, and it demands careful interpretation. The animal data is consistent and mechanistically coherent: THC changes epigenetic marks, those marks appear in sperm, and offspring show behavioral alterations in reward and drug-seeking pathways. The biological plausibility is real.

But the gap between rat models and human reproduction is wide. Humans undergo more extensive epigenetic reprogramming during early development than rodents. The THC doses used in animal studies, while designed to produce blood levels comparable to human use, are difficult to translate precisely. And no study has yet demonstrated true multigenerational transmission in humans — showing that your grandchildren, not just your children, are affected.

The responsible interpretation: this is a signal worth taking seriously, not a proof that your cannabis use will harm your future children. It belongs in the same category as the emerging evidence on paternal age, diet, and stress — environmental exposures that appear to leave epigenetic marks on sperm with potential consequences for offspring. The precautionary principle suggests caution, particularly for people planning families. But the evidence is not yet strong enough to make definitive causal claims in humans.

For people concerned about reproductive effects, the broader evidence is relevant: Zuckerman et al. (1989) documented lower birth weight with prenatal cannabis exposure, and Corsi et al. (2020) found associations between prenatal exposure and autism risk. The epigenetic data adds a dimension that most people haven't considered — that paternal exposure before conception, not just maternal exposure during pregnancy, may matter.

Should I stop using cannabis before trying to conceive?

The evidence isn't definitive enough for a firm medical recommendation, but the precautionary direction is clear. Animal studies show THC alters sperm epigenetics. Human studies confirm cannabis-related methylation changes. If you're planning a family and want to minimize unknown risks, stopping cannabis use before conception — for both partners — is a reasonable precaution. How far in advance? Sperm production takes approximately 74 days, so a minimum of 2-3 months of abstinence before conception would allow a full cycle of sperm production unaffected by THC.

Is this specific to cannabis, or do other drugs do the same thing?

Epigenetic effects on sperm have been documented for multiple exposures including alcohol, tobacco, opioids, stress, and diet. Cannabis is not unique in this regard — the endocannabinoid system happens to be well-represented in reproductive tissues, making it a plausible target for THC-mediated epigenetic changes. The broader lesson is that the sperm epigenome is more sensitive to environmental exposures than previously recognized.

Does this mean cannabis is worse than we thought?

It means our understanding of cannabis's biological effects may be incomplete. Most cannabis research focuses on acute effects in the user. Epigenetic research expands the time horizon — suggesting that effects might extend beyond the user, beyond the period of use, and potentially into the next generation. Whether these effects are clinically significant in humans remains to be determined.

Epigenetic Effects of Cannabis Exposure

Szutorisz H, Hurd YL (2016) · Biological Psychiatry

What the researchers found

This review examined the emerging field of cannabis epigenetics, where researchers study how cannabis exposure changes gene expression without altering the DNA sequence itself.

Accumulating evidence from both human and animal studies showed that cannabinoids can modify epigenetic marks, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, in brain tissue and peripheral cells. These modifications can alter which genes are turned on or off, potentially explaining the persistent behavioral effects of cannabis that outlast the drug's presence in the body.

Perhaps most provocatively, some animal studies suggested these epigenetic changes could be transmitted across generations. Parental cannabis exposure appeared to affect the epigenome of offspring, raising questions about intergenerational effects that go beyond the direct in-utero exposure that has been the traditional focus of concern.

Why it matters

If cannabis can change gene expression patterns that persist after the drug is gone and potentially pass to the next generation, it fundamentally changes how we think about cannabis safety. The effects may not be limited to the user or even the period of use, but could have biological consequences that extend across a lifetime and into the next generation.

The numbers in context

The review covered human and animal studies showing aberrant epigenetic modifications in brain and peripheral tissues linked to cannabis exposure. Specific mechanistic details were sparse at the time of publication.

How the study worked

Comprehensive review of published scientific literature examining epigenetic effects of cannabinoids, including studies in humans and animal models, covering DNA methylation, histone modifications, and chromatin remodeling.

What this study cannot tell us

The field was in its early stages when this review was published. Mechanistic details were sparse, and many findings were correlational. Most epigenetic studies were in animal models with doses and exposure patterns that may not reflect human use. The intergenerational findings need much more replication.

How to read the evidence

Moderate evidence from a comprehensive review of an emerging field. Individual studies provide proof of concept, but the field lacked the depth for definitive conclusions at the time of publication.

When this study was published

Published in 2016. Cannabis epigenetics has since become a more active research area with additional studies providing mechanistic detail.

The bigger picture

Epigenetics offers a molecular framework for understanding some of the most puzzling aspects of cannabis research: why effects persist long after drug clearance, why adolescent exposure has different consequences than adult exposure, and why parental substance use affects offspring risk for addiction.

Questions still open

  • Which specific genes are epigenetically altered by cannabis, and what are the functional consequences? Are epigenetic changes from cannabis reversible with abstinence? Do the intergenerational effects occur in humans? Could epigenetic markers serve as biomarkers for cannabis-related health risks?

Common questions

Can cannabis change your genes?
Cannabis does not change your DNA sequence, but it can change how genes are expressed through epigenetic modifications. These are chemical marks on DNA and associated proteins that turn genes on or off without altering the genetic code itself.
Could cannabis use affect your children's genes?
Some animal studies suggest parental cannabis exposure can alter the epigenome of offspring. Whether this occurs in humans and what the consequences might be are still open questions requiring much more research.

Read the original research

Epigenetic Effects of Cannabis Exposure.

Biological psychiatry, 79(7), 586-94

Citation

Szutorisz, Henrietta; Hurd, Yasmin L. (2016). Epigenetic Effects of Cannabis Exposure.. Biological psychiatry, 79(7), 586-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.09.014

Explore the wider topic