The Link Between Teen Cannabis Use and Psychological Distress Strengthened From 2013 to 2023

Among 35,000 Ontario teens, the cannabis-distress association grew stronger over a decade, especially for frequent female users, possibly reflecting rising THC potency.

McDonald, André J et al.·Addiction (Abingdon·2026·Strong EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-08477Cross SectionalStrong Evidence2026RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Strong Evidence
Sample
N=35,007

What This Study Found

Distress rose from 10.7% to 27.4% while cannabis use declined from 23.1% to 17.6%. Heavy use (40+ times) vs abstinence: adjusted prevalence difference went from 0% (2013) to 18% (2023). Dose-response in females but not males. Each later grade of initiation: 5% lower distress.

Key Numbers

35,007 students. Distress: 10.7% to 27.4%. Cannabis use: 23.1% to 17.6%. Heavy use-distress difference: 0% (2013) to 18% (2023). 5% lower distress per later grade of initiation.

How They Did This

Representative biennial surveys 2013-2023 in Ontario. 35,007 students grades 7-12. Modified Poisson regression with Kessler-6.

Why This Research Matters

The strengthening association despite declining use rates is consistent with rising potency driving more harm per user. The female dose-response is a new prevention-relevant finding.

The Bigger Picture

Cannabis potency has increased substantially. The parallel strengthening of the cannabis-distress link despite declining use supports the potency hypothesis.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cross-sectional at each wave. Cannot determine causation direction. Rising distress has many causes. Self-reported.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Is rising potency driving this?
  • ?Are females more biologically vulnerable?
  • ?Would potency limits help?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Heavy use-distress gap: 0% in 2013, 18% in 2023
Evidence Grade:
Large representative survey spanning 10 years with 35,000+ students.
Study Age:
2026 study
Original Title:
Adolescent cannabis use and psychological distress from 2013 to 2023: A population-based study in Ontario, Canada.
Published In:
Addiction (Abingdon, England) (2026)
Database ID:
RTHC-08477

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the association strengthening if fewer teens use?

Rising THC potency may mean each use has greater impact. Fewer teens using more potent cannabis could result in more harm per user.

Why does age of initiation matter?

Each later grade of starting was associated with 5% lower distress prevalence.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-08477·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-08477

APA

McDonald, André J; Doggett, Amanda; Bondy, Susan J; Colman, Ian; Cook, Steven; Hamilton, Hayley A; Kurdyak, Paul; Leatherdale, Scott T; Myran, Daniel T; Rehm, Jürgen; Wickens, Christine M; MacKillop, James; Halladay, Jillian. (2026). Adolescent cannabis use and psychological distress from 2013 to 2023: A population-based study in Ontario, Canada.. Addiction (Abingdon, England). https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70333

MLA

McDonald, André J, et al. "Adolescent cannabis use and psychological distress from 2013 to 2023: A population-based study in Ontario, Canada.." Addiction (Abingdon, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.70333

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Adolescent cannabis use and psychological distress from 2013..." RTHC-08477. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/mcdonald-2026-adolescent-cannabis-use-and

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.