rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Cannabis Use During Pregnancy Was Independently Linked to Postpartum PTSD and Depression

Prospective CohortModerate evidence
The takeaway

Both cannabis use and intimate partner violence during pregnancy were independently associated with worse postpartum mental health, with cannabis use linked to elevated PTSD and depression symptoms at 6 months postpartum.

Prenatal care providers, perinatal mental health professionals, and pregnant women considering cannabis use.

Cannabis use during pregnancy independently predicted postpartum PTSD (beta = 0.25)

What the researchers found

Cannabis use during pregnancy was significantly associated with elevated postpartum PTSD (beta = 0.25) and depression symptoms, independent of IPV victimization. IPV was associated with all three outcomes: PTSD (beta = 0.21), depression (beta = 0.17), and anxiety (beta = 0.21). The interaction between cannabis and IPV was not significant, indicating independent rather than synergistic effects.

Why it matters

Cannabis use during pregnancy is rising, and this study shows it may carry mental health risks for mothers beyond the well-documented concerns about fetal effects. The independence of cannabis and IPV effects means that addressing one risk factor does not eliminate the other.

The numbers in context

N = 257 women. Cannabis use: PTSD beta = 0.25 (p < 0.001), depression significant. IPV: PTSD beta = 0.21 (p = 0.005), depression beta = 0.17 (p = 0.022), anxiety beta = 0.21 (p = 0.008). Cannabis x IPV interaction: not significant.

How the study worked

Prospective cohort of 257 women assessed at three points during pregnancy for IPV and cannabis use, then at 6 months postpartum for PTSD, depression, and anxiety symptoms. Linear regression analyses tested main effects and the interaction between cannabis use and IPV.

What this study cannot tell us

Observational design cannot prove cannabis caused worse postpartum outcomes. Women using cannabis during pregnancy may have unmeasured risk factors. Self-reported cannabis use may be underreported due to stigma. The study cannot determine whether stopping cannabis would improve outcomes.

How to read the evidence

Prospective cohort with multiple pregnancy assessments and postpartum follow-up. Moderate evidence given the observational design and potential unmeasured confounders.

When this study was published

Published in 2025.

The bigger picture

The finding that cannabis use and IPV are independent risk factors suggests that prenatal screening should address both issues separately. Women experiencing IPV may use cannabis as a coping mechanism, but the study suggests this does not explain the cannabis-mental health link.

Questions still open

  • Does cannabis use during pregnancy cause postpartum mental health problems, or does it signal pre-existing vulnerability? Would cessation support during pregnancy improve postpartum outcomes?

Common questions

Does cannabis during pregnancy cause postpartum depression?
The study found an association but cannot prove causation. Women who use cannabis during pregnancy had higher postpartum PTSD and depression symptoms, but pre-existing mental health factors may contribute to both the cannabis use and the postpartum outcomes.
Did domestic violence and cannabis use make each other worse?
No. The interaction was not significant, meaning cannabis use and IPV each contributed independently to postpartum mental health problems. Having both risk factors did not produce a worse-than-expected combined effect.

Read the original research

Cannabis Use and Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy Are Associated with Poorer Postpartum Mental Health.

American journal of perinatology

Citation

Marvin, Matthew J; Ballinger, Alexandra L; Stein, Sara F; Fairchild, Jewelian N; Bogat, G Anne; Lonstein, Joseph S; Nuttall, Amy K; Muzik, Maria; Levendosky, Alytia A. (2025). Cannabis Use and Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy Are Associated with Poorer Postpartum Mental Health.. American journal of perinatology. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2761-1601

Explore the wider topic