College Students with OCD Have Higher Rates of Cannabis, Alcohol, and Tobacco Use

College students with OCD conditions had 11-14% higher odds of moderate/high-risk substance use and more than double the odds of disordered eating compared to peers without OCD.

Jacobs, Wura et al.·PloS one·2025·highcross-sectional survey
RTHC-06727Cross Sectional surveyhigh2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
cross-sectional survey
Evidence
high
Sample
N=92,757

What This Study Found

Among 92,757 undergraduates, OCD conditions were associated with increased odds of moderate/high-risk tobacco (aOR=1.12), cannabis (aOR=1.11), alcohol (aOR=1.14), and disordered eating (aOR=2.28). Effects persisted after adjusting for stress, depression, and anxiety. Gender differences emerged: cis-female students with OCD had elevated risk across all substances, while male students only showed increased disordered eating risk.

Key Numbers

92,757 students from 216 colleges. OCD and cannabis: aOR=1.11 (95% CI 1.04-1.18). OCD and alcohol: aOR=1.14 (95% CI 1.05-1.24). OCD and tobacco: aOR=1.12 (95% CI 1.05-1.21). OCD and disordered eating: aOR=2.28 (95% CI 2.13-2.43). TGNC students with OCD: aOR=1.24 for tobacco, aOR=2.14 for disordered eating.

How They Did This

Analysis of 92,757 undergraduate students aged 18-24 from 216 colleges using the ACHA-NCHA III (Fall 2021-Fall 2022). Regression models adjusted for covariates and school clustering.

Why This Research Matters

OCD is increasingly recognized in young adults, and understanding its association with substance use can help college health services screen for and address these co-occurring risks.

The Bigger Picture

The finding that OCD independently predicts substance use risk even after controlling for depression and anxiety challenges the assumption that substance use in OCD is simply driven by comorbid mood disorders.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cross-sectional design. Self-reported OCD conditions may include subclinical presentations. College students may not represent all young adults. Cannot determine if OCD drives substance use or vice versa.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Do students use cannabis specifically to manage OCD symptoms?
  • ?Would treating OCD more effectively reduce co-occurring substance use?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
College students with OCD had 2.28x higher odds of disordered eating and 11-14% higher odds of substance use
Evidence Grade:
Very large, multi-institutional sample (92,757 students, 216 colleges) with appropriate statistical adjustments. Cross-sectional design is the main limitation.
Study Age:
2025 publication with 2021-2022 data.
Original Title:
Substance use and disordered eating risk among college students with obsessive-compulsive conditions.
Published In:
PloS one, 20(1), e0316349 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06727

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06727·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06727

APA

Jacobs, Wura; DeLeon, Angela; Bristow, Alane; Quinn, Patrick; Lederer, Alyssa. (2025). Substance use and disordered eating risk among college students with obsessive-compulsive conditions.. PloS one, 20(1), e0316349. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316349

MLA

Jacobs, Wura, et al. "Substance use and disordered eating risk among college students with obsessive-compulsive conditions.." PloS one, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316349

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Substance use and disordered eating risk among college stude..." RTHC-06727. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/jacobs-2025-substance-use-and-disordered

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.