rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Warning Labels on Delta-8 THC Products Increased Youth Awareness of Intoxication and Harm

Experimental StudyModerate evidence
The takeaway

When adolescents viewed delta-8 THC products with warning labels, they rated the products as more intoxicating and harmful, with the strongest effects among cannabis-naive youth and for edible products.

Cannabis regulators, public health policymakers, youth prevention specialists

What the researchers found

Among 3,647 Southern California adolescents, those shown delta-8-THC products with larger warning labels (vs. unmodified packaging) reported greater anticipated intoxication, higher perceived health harm (RR=1.07), and greater belief that delta-8 products are as harmful as marijuana (RR=1.04). Warning label effects were stronger for edible products and for never-cannabis-using youth. However, warning labels did not reduce susceptibility to use. Differences between standard and larger warning labels were minimal.

Why it matters

Delta-8-THC products are widely available, often marketed as "legal THC," and unregulated in many states. This study provides the first experimental evidence that warning labels can increase youth awareness of these products' risks, though they may not be sufficient to deter use.

The numbers in context

3,647 adolescents; larger labels: +2.50 points anticipated intoxication; perceived harm RR=1.07; risk perception RR=1.03; equal/more harmful than marijuana RR=1.04; no effect on use susceptibility; effects stronger for gummies vs vape; stronger for never vs ever users

How the study worked

Mixed within-between-subject experiment in a 2023 survey of 3,647 Southern California adolescents. Randomized to view delta-8-THC edible and vape products under three conditions: unmodified, standard warning label, or larger warning label. Measured anticipated intoxication, perceived harm, and susceptibility to use.

What this study cannot tell us

Lab-based experiment showing hypothetical products; real-world effects may differ. Southern California sample may not generalize nationally. Effect sizes were small. Warning labels did not reduce susceptibility to use, limiting practical impact. Single exposure; repeated exposure effects unknown.

How to read the evidence

Moderate: large experimental sample with randomization, but lab setting and small effect sizes limit real-world implications.

When this study was published

2025 publication using 2023 data

The bigger picture

Delta-8-THC occupies a regulatory gray area in the US, sold as a hemp product but producing psychoactive effects. As these products proliferate in gas stations and convenience stores without cannabis market regulations, labeling requirements could be a minimal intervention.

Questions still open

  • Would sustained exposure to warning labels reduce use susceptibility over time?
  • What label content would most effectively deter youth from trying delta-8 products?

Read the original research

Impact of Delta-8-THC warning labels on perceived intoxication, harm, and susceptibility among adolescents.

The International journal on drug policy, 139, 104781

Citation

Harlow, Alyssa F; Leventhal, Adam M; Barrington-Trimis, Jessica L. (2025). Impact of Delta-8-THC warning labels on perceived intoxication, harm, and susceptibility among adolescents.. The International journal on drug policy, 139, 104781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104781

Explore the wider topic