Among 113 men, cannabis smokers had significantly more immotile sperm and greater DNA damage than both tobacco smokers and non-smokers, though mitochondrial gene variants did not differ between groups.
Reproductive medicine specialists, fertility counselors, men considering cannabis use
Cannabis smokers had significantly worse sperm DNA integrity than tobacco smokers
What the researchers found
Comparing 37 non-smokers, 39 tobacco smokers, and 37 cannabis smokers, both tobacco and cannabis groups showed reduced normal sperm morphology and non-progressive motility. However, cannabis smokers had significantly higher rates of immotile sperm, positive acridine orange staining (indicating DNA denaturation), and positive CMA3 scores (indicating chromatin immaturity) compared to both tobacco smokers and non-smokers (P<0.001). No differences in mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase gene variants were found between groups.
Why it matters
As cannabis use increases among men of reproductive age while tobacco use declines, understanding the comparative reproductive risks matters. This study found cannabis smoking produced worse sperm DNA damage than tobacco, suggesting a distinct mechanism of reproductive harm.
The numbers in context
n=113 (37 NS, 39 TS, 37 CS); cannabis smokers had higher immotile sperm, AO+, and CMA3+ scores (all P<0.001 vs NS and TS); 23 SNPs in MT-CO1, 15 in MT-CO2, 30 in MT-CO3, none different between groups
How the study worked
Semen samples from 113 men divided into non-smokers (n=37), tobacco smokers (n=39), and cannabis smokers (n=37). Sperm quality assessed by standard parameters. DNA integrity tested by Chromomycin A3 and acridine orange staining. Mitochondrial MT-CO1, MT-CO2, and MT-CO3 genes amplified and sequenced.
What this study cannot tell us
Small sample sizes per group (37-39). Cross-sectional design cannot establish causation. Did not control for frequency or duration of smoking. Co-use of cannabis and tobacco was not addressed. Genetic analysis was limited to mitochondrial genes.
How to read the evidence
Small cross-sectional study with three comparison groups provides preliminary evidence, but limited sample sizes and inability to control for co-use patterns reduce confidence.
When this study was published
2025 publication
The bigger picture
Male fertility has been declining globally, and understanding modifiable risk factors is critical. This study adds cannabis smoking to the list of reproductive hazards and suggests it may be more damaging to sperm DNA than tobacco, a finding relevant to fertility counseling.
Questions still open
- Does cannabis-related sperm damage reverse with cessation? Is the damage driven by THC, combustion products, or both?
Common questions
Is cannabis worse for sperm than tobacco?
Did the study find genetic changes from cannabis use?
Read the original research
Effects of marijuana and tobacco on male fertility and their relationship to genetic variation of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase genes.
Scientific reports, 15(1), 7547
Citation
Amor, Houda; Ismaeil, Ayham; Jankowski, Peter Michael; Smadi, Mohammad A Al; Zoubi, Mazhar S Al; Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf; Hammadeh, Mohamad Eid. (2025). Effects of marijuana and tobacco on male fertility and their relationship to genetic variation of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase genes.. Scientific reports, 15(1), 7547. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91894-0
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?