Meta-analysis found cannabis use associated with 53% higher all-cause mortality, but evidence quality was low
A meta-analysis of 14 cohort studies covering 17.5 million participants found cannabis users had 53% higher all-cause mortality than non-users, though the association was driven by general population studies and did not hold in patient populations.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Across 14 cohort studies with 17,545,076 participants (3,000,667 cannabis users), cannabis use was associated with a risk ratio of 1.53 (95% CI: 1.09-2.14) for all-cause mortality. The effect was significantly larger in prospective designs (RR 2.07) versus retrospective (RR 1.11), and in general population cohorts (RR 2.53) versus patient populations (RR 1.03). Larger sample sizes were associated with smaller effects. GRADE assessment rated overall evidence certainty as low.
Key Numbers
n=17,545,076 (3,000,667 cannabis users); 14 cohort studies (50% prospective); overall RR 1.53 (95% CI: 1.09-2.14); general population RR 2.53; patient population RR 1.03; I²=98%; GRADE: low certainty
How They Did This
Systematic review and meta-analysis registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023396915). Searched Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and ProQuest through October 2023. Included cohort studies comparing cannabis users to non-users for all-cause mortality. Random-effects meta-analysis with sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and Newcastle Ottawa Scale quality assessment.
Why This Research Matters
This is the first meta-analysis to synthesize evidence on cannabis use and all-cause mortality. The finding of a 53% increased risk is notable but comes with substantial caveats: high heterogeneity, potential confounding, and the association disappearing in patient populations suggest the relationship is more complex than a simple causal link.
The Bigger Picture
Whether cannabis use itself increases mortality or whether cannabis users have other risk factors that drive mortality remains one of the most consequential unanswered questions in cannabis epidemiology. This meta-analysis finds an association but cannot resolve the causation question due to the limitations of the underlying studies.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Very high heterogeneity (I²=98%) reduces confidence in the pooled estimate. Unadjusted estimates included in many studies mean confounding factors (tobacco, alcohol, socioeconomic status) likely inflate the association. GRADE assessment rated evidence as low certainty. Larger studies showed smaller effects, suggesting potential publication bias or confounding.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would fully adjusted analyses controlling for tobacco, alcohol, and socioeconomic factors change the mortality association?
- ?Why was the association absent in patient populations but present in general population cohorts?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- 53% higher mortality risk, but I²=98% heterogeneity
- Evidence Grade:
- Meta-analysis of cohort studies provides important synthesis, but very high heterogeneity, unadjusted estimates, and GRADE-rated low certainty significantly limit confidence in the pooled estimate.
- Study Age:
- 2025 publication; searched through October 2023; PROSPERO registered
- Original Title:
- Relative Risk of All-Cause Mortality Associated With Cannabis Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.
- Published In:
- Health science reports, 8(10), e71212 (2025)
- Authors:
- Alimoradi, Zainab, Lin, Chung-Ying, Myran, Daniel T(16), Solmi, Marco, Pakpour, Amir H
- Database ID:
- RTHC-05906
Evidence Hierarchy
Combines results from multiple studies to find an overall pattern.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Does cannabis use increase the risk of death?
This meta-analysis found an association between cannabis use and 53% higher all-cause mortality, but the evidence quality was rated low. The association was strongest in general population studies and absent in patient populations, and confounding factors like tobacco and alcohol use were not consistently controlled for.
Why was heterogeneity so high?
The 98% heterogeneity reflects major differences across studies in design (prospective vs retrospective), population (general vs patients), sample size, and whether confounders were adjusted for. This makes the single pooled estimate less meaningful than the subgroup differences.
Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05906APA
Alimoradi, Zainab; Lin, Chung-Ying; Myran, Daniel T; Solmi, Marco; Pakpour, Amir H. (2025). Relative Risk of All-Cause Mortality Associated With Cannabis Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.. Health science reports, 8(10), e71212. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71212
MLA
Alimoradi, Zainab, et al. "Relative Risk of All-Cause Mortality Associated With Cannabis Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.." Health science reports, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.71212
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Relative Risk of All-Cause Mortality Associated With Cannabi..." RTHC-05906. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/alimoradi-2025-relative-risk-of-allcause
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.