Bad Mood Made People Report More Cannabis Problems Even When Their Use Had Not Changed

In an experiment with over 700 participants, those randomly assigned to a negative mood induction reported more cannabis-related problems and more negative cannabis expectancies than controls, even though actual use did not differ.

Altman, Brianna R et al.·Addictive behaviors·2023·Moderate EvidenceRandomized Controlled Trial
RTHC-04367Randomized Controlled TrialModerate Evidence2023RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Randomized Controlled Trial
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
N=700

What This Study Found

Participants assigned to the negative affect induction reported significantly greater negative cannabis expectancies and more cannabis problems compared to the control group, after controlling for age and education. This suggests that current mood state can bias self-reports of substance use outcomes, which has implications for research and clinical assessment.

Key Numbers

700+ participants; negative affect induction significantly increased reported cannabis problems; significantly increased negative cannabis expectancies; actual cannabis use was not different between groups

How They Did This

Randomized experimental study of over 700 participants recruited from Amazon MTurk. After baseline affect and demographics, participants were randomly assigned to a negative affect induction or control condition. Post-induction measures assessed affect state and cannabis-related variables.

Why This Research Matters

Most cannabis research and clinical assessments rely on self-reported problems. If being in a bad mood inflates reports of cannabis problems, then study findings and clinical evaluations conducted when patients are distressed may overestimate the harms of cannabis use.

The Bigger Picture

This finding could have wide-ranging implications for cannabis research methodology. If mood state biases reporting, then studies that assess participants during stressful times (clinic visits, withdrawal periods) may systematically overestimate cannabis-related problems.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Online sample from MTurk may not represent clinical populations. The mood induction was brief and artificial. Cannot determine whether mood bias affects all types of self-reported substance measures equally. Did not test whether positive mood produces opposite bias.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Should cannabis researchers control for current mood state when collecting self-reports?
  • ?Does this bias affect reports for other substances similarly?
  • ?Would mood-neutral assessment protocols produce different prevalence estimates for cannabis problems?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Mood biased problem reporting
Evidence Grade:
Randomized experimental design with large sample, but online MTurk participants may not represent clinical populations
Study Age:
2023 study
Original Title:
Induced negative affect's impact on self-reported cannabis use, expectancies, and problems.
Published In:
Addictive behaviors, 141, 107652 (2023)
Database ID:
RTHC-04367

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled TrialGold standard for testing treatments
This study
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Participants are randomly assigned to treatment or placebo groups to test cause and effect.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Can your mood affect how you perceive your cannabis use?

Yes. This study found that people in a bad mood reported more cannabis-related problems than those in a neutral mood, even when their actual use patterns were the same. Current emotional state appears to color self-assessment.

What does this mean for cannabis research?

It suggests that self-reported cannabis problems may be inflated when participants are assessed during periods of negative mood, which could bias study conclusions about how harmful cannabis use is.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-04367·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-04367

APA

Altman, Brianna R; Earleywine, Mitch. (2023). Induced negative affect's impact on self-reported cannabis use, expectancies, and problems.. Addictive behaviors, 141, 107652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107652

MLA

Altman, Brianna R, et al. "Induced negative affect's impact on self-reported cannabis use, expectancies, and problems.." Addictive behaviors, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107652

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Induced negative affect's impact on self-reported cannabis u..." RTHC-04367. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/altman-2023-induced-negative-affects-impact

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.