Young people with substance use disorders had worse mental health than substance-using peers without a disorder

Among Australian youth seeking mental healthcare, those with a diagnosed substance use disorder reported more severe depression, anxiety, and higher frequency cannabis use than those who used substances without meeting disorder criteria.

Ahounbar, Ellie et al.·Early intervention in psychiatry·2025·Preliminary EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-05883Cross SectionalPreliminary Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
N=79

What This Study Found

Comparing 51 youth with a current SUD to 21 without a lifetime SUD diagnosis, those with SUD endorsed more severe depressive and anxiety symptoms, lower quality of life and role functioning, more alcohol-related problems, and higher frequency cannabis use. They also had higher risk scores for alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, cocaine, amphetamines, and hallucinogens. No group differences emerged for social/occupational functioning or subjectively rated sleep quality.

Key Numbers

n=79 (51 with current SUD, 21 without lifetime SUD); ages 12-25; SUD group had higher frequency cannabis use and higher risk scores across 6 substance categories; no differences in social/occupational functioning or sleep

How They Did This

Baseline data from the INTEGRATE clinical trial. 79 participants aged 12-25 with high-prevalence mental illness and substance use recruited from headspace primary mental health centres in North-Western Melbourne. Self-report and interview measures of psychiatric diagnoses, symptoms, functioning, and substance use.

Why This Research Matters

Youth mental health services frequently encounter substance use but may not distinguish between use and disorder. This study shows the clinical gap between the two is substantial, with SUD-diagnosed youth carrying heavier psychiatric and functional burdens that require integrated treatment approaches.

The Bigger Picture

The high overlap between substance use disorders and mental illness in young people supports integrated early intervention models. Treating either condition in isolation likely misses the compounding effects of comorbidity.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Small sample (n=79) with only 21 in the comparison group. Baseline cross-sectional data cannot establish causal direction. Recruited from a specific Melbourne region, limiting generalizability. Secondary analysis of trial data, not designed primarily for this comparison.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Does early integrated treatment for co-occurring SUD and mental illness in youth prevent escalation of both conditions?
  • ?Why did social functioning not differ between groups when other measures did?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
SUD-diagnosed youth had higher risk scores across 6 substance categories
Evidence Grade:
Baseline cross-sectional data from a small clinical trial provides preliminary evidence with limited generalizability due to sample size and single-region recruitment.
Study Age:
2025 publication; trial registered as ACTRN12619001522101
Original Title:
Characteristics of Youth With Recent Substance Use With and Without Substance Use Disorder Presenting for Primary Mental Healthcare in Australia: Baseline Findings From the INTEGRATE Trial.
Published In:
Early intervention in psychiatry, 19(12), e70106 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-05883

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the difference between the two groups?

Both groups used substances, but those meeting diagnostic criteria for a substance use disorder had significantly worse depression, anxiety, quality of life, and higher frequency cannabis use than those who used substances without qualifying for a disorder.

Did cannabis use specifically differentiate the groups?

Yes. Youth with an SUD had higher frequency cannabis use and higher cannabis risk scores compared to those without a lifetime SUD, along with higher risk scores for alcohol, tobacco, cocaine, amphetamines, and hallucinogens.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-05883·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05883

APA

Ahounbar, Ellie; Guerin, Alexandre A; Hides, Leanne; Bendall, Sarah; Chanen, Andrew; Clarke, Sarah; Quinn, Amelia; Baird, Shelley; Killackey, Eóin; McGorry, Patrick; Bedi, Gillinder. (2025). Characteristics of Youth With Recent Substance Use With and Without Substance Use Disorder Presenting for Primary Mental Healthcare in Australia: Baseline Findings From the INTEGRATE Trial.. Early intervention in psychiatry, 19(12), e70106. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70106

MLA

Ahounbar, Ellie, et al. "Characteristics of Youth With Recent Substance Use With and Without Substance Use Disorder Presenting for Primary Mental Healthcare in Australia: Baseline Findings From the INTEGRATE Trial.." Early intervention in psychiatry, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.70106

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Characteristics of Youth With Recent Substance Use With and ..." RTHC-05883. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/ahounbar-2025-characteristics-of-youth-with

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.