ACOG's Official Position in 2017: Pregnant Women Should Stop Using Cannabis

The leading U.S. obstetrics organization recommended against all cannabis use during pregnancy and breastfeeding, citing neurodevelopment concerns and insufficient safety data.

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists·Obstetrics & Gynecology·2017·Preliminary EvidenceNarrative Review·1 min read
RTHC-01326Narrative ReviewPreliminary Evidence2017RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Narrative Review
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
Review of existing studies on marijuana use during pregnancy and lactation.
Participants
Review of existing studies on marijuana use during pregnancy and lactation.

What This Study Found

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a formal committee opinion stating that pregnant women should discontinue cannabis use, and that doctors should not prescribe or recommend it during pregnancy or lactation. Self-reported cannabis use during pregnancy ranged from 2% to 5% in most studies at the time, and ACOG anticipated that number would rise as more states legalized.

The opinion was based on concerns about impaired fetal neurodevelopment and the added risks of smoking as a delivery method. For women using cannabis medicinally, ACOG recommended switching to alternative treatments with better pregnancy-specific safety data. On breastfeeding, the position was more cautious than definitive: they acknowledged insufficient data to fully evaluate risks but discouraged use given the unknowns.

Key Numbers

  • Self-reported cannabis use during pregnancy: 2–5% in most studies
  • Committee Opinion No. 722 — formal ACOG guidance
  • Recommendation: discontinue all cannabis use during pregnancy, preconception, and lactation

How They Did This

Committee opinion from ACOG based on review of available clinical and preclinical evidence. Committee opinions represent expert consensus when rigorous evidence is limited — they carry institutional authority but are not systematic reviews or meta-analyses.

Why This Research Matters

This wasn't a study finding new data. It was the most influential obstetrics organization in the country drawing a line based on what was known and, more importantly, what wasn't. The 2-5% self-reported use rate was likely an undercount given stigma around disclosure. With legalization expanding, ACOG was positioning ahead of what they expected to become a more common clinical question.

The distinction between "we know this is harmful" and "we don't have enough data to say it's safe" matters here. ACOG's recommendation was largely precautionary — the neurodevelopment concerns were real but not conclusively established in humans at the time.

The Bigger Picture

This opinion became the default clinical reference point for OB-GYNs counseling patients about cannabis. It was published as legalization was accelerating, and the gap between legal access and pregnancy safety data was widening. Since 2017, some studies have added evidence about THC and fetal brain development, but the fundamental problem ACOG identified — not enough human data to know what's safe — largely persists.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Committee opinions are expert consensus documents, not systematic reviews. The evidence base ACOG drew from was limited, particularly for breastfeeding. The opinion didn't distinguish between different cannabis products, doses, or timing of use during pregnancy. Self-reported prevalence likely understates actual use.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Has cannabis use during pregnancy increased since legalization, as ACOG predicted?
  • ?Are there differences in risk between occasional and daily prenatal cannabis use?
  • ?Does CBD without THC carry the same fetal neurodevelopment concerns?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
2–5% Self-reported cannabis use rate during pregnancy in most studies
Evidence Grade:
Committee opinion based on expert consensus with limited direct evidence. Carries institutional weight but reflects precautionary reasoning, not conclusive proof of harm.
Study Age:
Published in 2017. Subsequent research has added some evidence, but the core data gap ACOG identified — limited human pregnancy safety data — largely remains.
Original Title:
Committee Opinion No. 722: Marijuana use during pregnancy and lactation
Published In:
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 130(4), e205-e209 (2017)Obstetrics & Gynecology is a well-respected journal focusing on women's health and reproductive medicine.
Database ID:
RTHC-01326

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Summarizes existing research without a strict systematic method.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Did ACOG say cannabis is definitely harmful during pregnancy?

Not exactly. They said the neurodevelopment concerns plus insufficient safety data warranted recommending against use. It was precautionary — not enough evidence to say it's safe.

What about CBD products during pregnancy?

ACOG did not distinguish between THC and CBD products. Their blanket recommendation was to discontinue all marijuana use during pregnancy.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-01326·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-01326

APA

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Committee Opinion). (2017). Committee Opinion No. 722: Marijuana use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 130(4), e205-e209. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002354

MLA

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. "Committee Opinion No. 722: Marijuana use during pregnancy and lactation." Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002354

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Committee Opinion No. 722: Marijuana use during pregnancy an..." RTHC-01326. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/acog-2017-marijuana-pregnancy

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.