Living Closer to Cannabis Stores Linked to Higher Prenatal Cannabis Use During the Pandemic

Among nearly 100,000 pregnancies in Northern California, prenatal cannabis use was more common among those living closer to cannabis retailers, and the absolute increase during the COVID-19 pandemic was greater for those within a 10-minute drive of a store.

Young-Wolff, Kelly C et al.·JAMA network open·2022·Moderate EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-04324Cross SectionalModerate Evidence2022RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Prenatal cannabis use before (6.8%) and during (8.2%) the pandemic was associated with closer proximity to a retailer, greater retailer density, and living in jurisdictions that permitted rather than banned storefront retailers. While relative rate increases during the pandemic were similar regardless of retail access, the absolute increase was larger among those within a 10-minute drive of a retailer.

Key Numbers

99,127 pregnancies; 6.8% prenatal cannabis use pre-pandemic; 8.2% during pandemic; greater absolute increase within 10-minute drive of retailer; adjusted for age and race/ethnicity

How They Did This

Cross-sectional population-based time series study of 99,127 pregnancies in Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Cannabis use measured by universal urine toxicology at entry to prenatal care. Proximity to nearest retailer, retailer density within 15-minute drive, and local storefront policies mapped. Interrupted time series models with Poisson regression.

Why This Research Matters

This is among the largest studies to connect the physical retail environment to prenatal cannabis use. Finding that proximity to stores matters adds geographic accessibility to the list of factors influencing prenatal use, which could inform zoning and policy decisions.

The Bigger Picture

As cannabis retail expands nationwide, understanding how the retail environment shapes use patterns, especially during pregnancy, can help policymakers balance access with public health. Buffer zones around certain areas are already debated, and this data adds pregnancy-relevant evidence.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Observational study cannot prove retailer proximity caused higher use. Limited to one health system in Northern California. Urine toxicology detects recent use but cannot distinguish frequency or amount. The pandemic created unique conditions that may not reflect typical patterns.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would zoning restrictions around residential areas reduce prenatal cannabis use?
  • ?Does delivery availability negate the effect of physical store distance?
  • ?How do these findings apply in states with different retail models?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
99,127 pregnancies analyzed
Evidence Grade:
Large population-based study with objective cannabis measurement, though observational design limits causal inference
Study Age:
2022 study
Original Title:
Geographic Accessibility of Retail Cannabis in Northern California and Prenatal Cannabis Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Published In:
JAMA network open, 5(11), e2244086 (2022)
Database ID:
RTHC-04324

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Does living near a cannabis store increase prenatal use?

This study found an association between closer proximity to cannabis retailers and higher rates of prenatal cannabis use, but it cannot prove the stores caused the higher use. People who choose to live near stores may differ in other ways.

Did the pandemic increase prenatal cannabis use?

Yes. Prenatal cannabis use rose from 6.8% before the pandemic to 8.2% during it. The absolute increase was larger for those living closer to cannabis retailers.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-04324·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-04324

APA

Young-Wolff, Kelly C; Slama, Natalie E; Padon, Alisa A; Silver, Lynn D; Soroosh, Aurash; Alexeeff, Stacey E; Adams, Sara R; Does, Monique B; Campbell, Cynthia I; Ansley, Deborah; Conway, Amy; Goler, Nancy; Avalos, Lyndsay A. (2022). Geographic Accessibility of Retail Cannabis in Northern California and Prenatal Cannabis Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic.. JAMA network open, 5(11), e2244086. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44086

MLA

Young-Wolff, Kelly C, et al. "Geographic Accessibility of Retail Cannabis in Northern California and Prenatal Cannabis Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic.." JAMA network open, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44086

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Geographic Accessibility of Retail Cannabis in Northern Cali..." RTHC-04324. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/young-wolff-2022-geographic-accessibility-of-retail

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.