rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Parent Disapproval Directly Reduces Youth Cannabis Use While Peer Disapproval Works Through Risk Perception

Cross SectionalModerate evidence
The takeaway

Analysis of 2,293 adolescents found that parent disapproval had a stronger direct effect on reducing marijuana use, while peer disapproval worked more through increasing youth risk perception, with similar patterns in states with and without medical marijuana legalization.

Parents, educators, and prevention specialists interested in reducing youth cannabis use

2,293 adolescents surveyed

What the researchers found

Parent disapproval had a stronger direct effect on reducing youth marijuana use, while peer disapproval had a stronger indirect effect working through increased risk perception. Both parent and peer disapproval increased youth risk perception of marijuana. The mechanisms were similar regardless of whether youth lived in states with medical marijuana legalization.

Why it matters

Understanding how social disapproval reduces youth cannabis use through different pathways can help design more effective prevention programs. The finding that these mechanisms work similarly regardless of legal status suggests that social influence remains potent even as laws change.

The numbers in context

2,293 adolescents aged 12-17; parent disapproval had stronger direct effect on use; peer disapproval had stronger indirect effect via risk perception; similar patterns in MML vs non-MML states

How the study worked

Cross-sectional analysis of the 2019 National Survey of Drug Use and Health, focusing on youth aged 12-17 (N=2,293). Used structural equation modeling and bias-corrected bootstrapping to test path models. Compared mediating mechanisms between youth in medical marijuana legalization (MML) states and non-MML states.

What this study cannot tell us

Cross-sectional design cannot establish temporal ordering of disapproval, risk perception, and use. Self-reported data from 12-17-year-olds may be subject to social desirability bias. MML states vary widely in their specific regulations and enforcement.

How to read the evidence

Large nationally representative sample with structural equation modeling, but cross-sectional design limits causal inference

When this study was published

2022 study

The bigger picture

As cannabis legalization expands, there is concern that reduced social disapproval will increase youth use. This study suggests that parental and peer attitudes still strongly shape youth behavior regardless of legal context, pointing to the importance of maintaining clear messaging from trusted social sources.

Questions still open

  • Does recreational legalization (as opposed to medical) weaken these social influence pathways? How do parental attitudes evolve after legalization? Would longitudinal data show the same mechanisms over time?

Common questions

Does cannabis legalization make teens more likely to use?
This study found the social mechanisms that discourage use (parent and peer disapproval working through risk perception) operated similarly in states with and without medical marijuana legalization, suggesting legalization does not necessarily override social influence.
Is parent or peer influence more important?
They work differently. Parent disapproval had a stronger direct effect on reducing use, while peer disapproval had a stronger indirect effect by shaping how risky teens perceived marijuana to be.

Read the original research

The influence of parent and peer disapproval on youth marijuana use mediated by youth risk perception: Focusing on the state comparison.

Drug and alcohol dependence, 240, 109641

Citation

Yang, Eunbyeor Sophie; Oh, Su-Kyung; Kim, Seohyun; Chung, Ick-Joong. (2022). The influence of parent and peer disapproval on youth marijuana use mediated by youth risk perception: Focusing on the state comparison.. Drug and alcohol dependence, 240, 109641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109641

Explore the wider topic