rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

How Different Cannabis Tax Structures Affect Teen and Young Adult Purchasing

Quasi ExperimentalModerate evidence
The takeaway

In 1,100 youth and young adults, higher taxes reduced cannabis and THC consumption, but potency-based taxes had the paradoxical effect of increasing consumption of low-THC products.

Cannabis policymakers, youth health advocates, economists studying substance taxation, and parents concerned about teen cannabis access.

What the researchers found

Higher pre-tax prices and tax rates reduced both quantity and THC consumption among youth/young adults. Potency-based taxes reduced high-THC product use but increased low-THC consumption by 30-32%, and tax impacts could be offset by shifting to illegal products.

Why it matters

Youth are particularly vulnerable to cannabis harms, yet tax policy designed to reduce potency could backfire by increasing overall consumption of lower-THC products or driving youth to the illegal market.

The numbers in context

1,100 AYAs ages 15-20. Price elasticity: -0.3. Potency-based taxes increased cannabis quantity 30-32% vs. weight-based. Tax rates beyond 60% of pretax prices showed no additional reduction.

How the study worked

Split-sample volumetric choice experiment with 1,100 nationally representative youth and young adults (ages 15-20), randomized to weight-, price-, or potency-based tax conditions with varying prices, rates, and THC levels.

What this study cannot tell us

Hypothetical purchase tasks may not reflect real behavior. Ages 15-20 includes both legal and underage purchasers. Illegal market availability assumed rather than measured.

How to read the evidence

Nationally representative sample with experimental design, but hypothetical choices and complex tax interactions limit definitive conclusions.

When this study was published

Recent study addressing the critical question of how cannabis tax design specifically affects the most vulnerable age group.

The bigger picture

Cannabis tax policy involves tricky trade-offs for youth protection. Reducing access to high-potency products is good, but if youth just consume more low-potency products or shift to the illegal market, the net health impact may be neutral or negative.

Questions still open

  • Is there a tax rate that optimally discourages youth use without driving them to illegal markets? Would tiered tax structures outperform simple potency or weight-based approaches?

Common questions

Do cannabis taxes reduce teen use?
Higher prices and taxes do reduce quantity purchased in this experimental setting. However, the effect plateaus around 60% tax rates, and youth may shift to illegal sources to avoid taxes.
Is taxing by potency better for protecting youth?
It reduces high-THC product consumption but paradoxically increases low-THC product use by 30-32%. The authors suggest tiered tax structures might balance these trade-offs better.

Read the original research

How tax structures for retail cannabis shape cannabis use among youth and young adults: evidence from a volumetric choice experiment.

The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care

Citation

Xu, Lei; He, Yanyun; Park, Hojin; Zhang, Shiqi; Ma, Shaoying; Shang, Ce. (2025). How tax structures for retail cannabis shape cannabis use among youth and young adults: evidence from a volumetric choice experiment.. The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01875-3

Explore the wider topic