How Eating Cannabis Edibles Affects Simulated Driving Performance

In 88 adults, edible cannabis impaired driving simulator performance, with effects varying by usage frequency, THC dose, and whether driving was in urban or rural settings.

Won, Nae Y et al.·Traffic injury prevention·2025·Moderate Evidenceclinical-trial
RTHC-07968Clinical TrialModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
clinical-trial
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
N=29

What This Study Found

Edible cannabis impaired simulated driving performance across speed control and lane maintenance measures, with daily users showing different patterns than occasional users, and effects varying between rural and urban driving scenarios.

Key Numbers

88 adults: 29 daily users, 30 occasional users, 29 non-users. Denver, Colorado, recruited November 2023 to July 2024. Measured speed, lane departure, and other driving metrics.

How They Did This

Within-subjects driving simulator study in Denver, Colorado with 88 adults (25-55 years) in three groups: daily users (n=29), occasional users (n=30), and non-users/comparison (n=29), assessing driving after edible cannabis consumption.

Why This Research Matters

Edibles are increasingly popular but their driving impairment profile differs from smoked cannabis — slower onset, longer duration, and harder to self-regulate dosing. This creates unique road safety concerns.

The Bigger Picture

Most cannabis-impaired driving research focuses on smoked cannabis. As edibles gain market share, understanding their specific impairment profile is critical for public safety messaging and policy.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Simulator driving doesn't perfectly replicate real-world driving. Denver population in a legal state may not represent all drivers. Within-subjects design may have practice effects.

Questions This Raises

  • ?How long after consuming edibles should people wait before driving?
  • ?Should impaired driving laws differentiate between edible and smoked cannabis consumption?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Evidence Grade:
Well-designed within-subjects simulator study with appropriate comparison groups, though simulated driving has inherent limitations.
Study Age:
Very recent study (2023-2024 recruitment) addressing the timely issue of edible cannabis and driving safety.
Original Title:
Edible cannabis use on simulated driving performance.
Published In:
Traffic injury prevention, 1-9 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-07968

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Are edibles worse for driving than smoking cannabis?

This study focused on edibles specifically. Edibles have delayed onset and longer duration, potentially making it harder for users to judge when they're impaired compared to smoked cannabis.

Did daily cannabis users drive better than occasional users after edibles?

The study found different patterns between daily and occasional users, which is consistent with research showing some tolerance development, though impairment was still observed.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-07968·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-07968

APA

Won, Nae Y; Bird, Sarah; Wrobel, Julia; Brown, Timothy; Brooks-Russell, Ashley. (2025). Edible cannabis use on simulated driving performance.. Traffic injury prevention, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2574271

MLA

Won, Nae Y, et al. "Edible cannabis use on simulated driving performance.." Traffic injury prevention, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2025.2574271

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Edible cannabis use on simulated driving performance." RTHC-07968. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/won-2025-edible-cannabis-use-on

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.