In mice, four synthetic cannabinoids caused visible convulsions that were blocked by a CB1 receptor antagonist but not by the anti-seizure drug diazepam, and EEG recordings confirmed the convulsions were not accompanied by brain seizure activity.
People interested in synthetic cannabinoid toxicity and emergency treatment approaches
4 synthetic cannabinoids tested
What the researchers found
Convulsant doses of AB-PINACA, 5F-AB-PINACA, 5F-ADB-PINACA, and JWH-018 did not produce seizure patterns on EEG despite causing visible convulsions. Rimonabant (CB1 antagonist) blocked the convulsions, but diazepam did not. This suggests the convulsions are CB1-mediated motor events, not epileptic seizures.
Why it matters
Convulsions from synthetic cannabinoids are commonly treated as seizures in emergency rooms. If these are not true seizures, benzodiazepines (the standard seizure treatment) may be ineffective, and different treatment approaches may be needed.
The numbers in context
4 synthetic cannabinoids tested; 10 mg/kg rimonabant blocked convulsions; 10 mg/kg diazepam did not; repeated dosing produced partial tolerance; no cross-tolerance to PTZ-induced convulsions
How the study worked
Mouse study using NIH Swiss mice. Dose-response testing for convulsant effects, with pretreatment experiments using rimonabant, diazepam, and a CYP450 inhibitor. Separate cohort fitted with EEG headmounts to record brain activity during convulsions. Root-mean-square power and spike analysis used to assess seizure-like activity.
What this study cannot tell us
Animal study results may not directly translate to humans. Only male mice were used. Limited number of synthetic cannabinoids tested relative to the hundreds in circulation. EEG recordings in mice have lower spatial resolution than human EEG.
How to read the evidence
Well-designed animal study with multiple compounds and verification methods, but findings need human confirmation
When this study was published
2022 study
The bigger picture
Synthetic cannabinoids remain a public health concern, especially in populations with limited access to regulated cannabis. Understanding that their convulsions differ mechanistically from epileptic seizures could change emergency treatment protocols.
Questions still open
- Do these findings hold true in humans experiencing synthetic cannabinoid convulsions? If benzodiazepines are ineffective, what should emergency departments use instead? Do newer-generation synthetic cannabinoids produce the same non-seizure convulsions?
Common questions
Are synthetic cannabinoid convulsions dangerous?
Why would benzodiazepines not work for these convulsions?
Read the original research
Convulsant doses of abused synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists AB-PINACA, 5F-AB-PINACA, 5F-ADB-PINACA and JWH-018 do not elicit electroencephalographic (EEG) seizures in male mice.
Psychopharmacology, 239(10), 3237-3248
Citation
Wilson, Catheryn D; Zheng, Fang; Fantegrossi, William E. (2022). Convulsant doses of abused synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists AB-PINACA, 5F-AB-PINACA, 5F-ADB-PINACA and JWH-018 do not elicit electroencephalographic (EEG) seizures in male mice.. Psychopharmacology, 239(10), 3237-3248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-022-06205-6
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?