rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Prenatal Cannabis Exposure Linked to Self-Regulation Problems That Emerge as Children Grow

Systematic ReviewModerate evidence
The takeaway

A systematic review of 33 studies found prenatal cannabis exposure is linked to age-dependent self-regulation problems in young children, with regulatory difficulties becoming more apparent after age 2.

Developmental pediatricians, early childhood educators, prenatal care providers, parents.

33 studies: regulation problems emerge after age 2

What the researchers found

From 1,061 screened articles, 33 were included. Diminished regulatory abilities were more common in infants after prenatal cannabis exposure, while specific regulatory problems (behavioral, emotional) were more frequently found after age 2. Mechanisms included changes in methylation and expression of endocannabinoid, dopaminergic, and opioid system genes, increased cortisol reactivity, altered immune markers, and changes in brain structure and connectivity.

Why it matters

Self-regulation, the ability to control attention, emotions, and behavior, is foundational for child development. This review shows that prenatal cannabis exposure may undermine these abilities through multiple neurobiological pathways, with effects that become more apparent as children reach ages where self-regulation demands increase.

The numbers in context

33 studies included from 1,061 screened. Children ages 0-6. Regulatory difficulties more apparent after age 2. Multiple mechanisms identified: gene methylation, cortisol, brain structure changes.

How the study worked

Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, searching Medline, Web of Science, and PsycInfo. Included studies of children ages 0-6 with preconception, prenatal, or postnatal cannabis exposure. Investigated regulatory abilities, regulatory problems, and neurobiological mechanisms. Registered with PROSPERO.

What this study cannot tell us

Limited number of studies meeting criteria. Small sample sizes in many studies. Lack of control for maternal psychopathology in most studies. Cannabis exposure poorly quantified in many studies. Cannot fully separate cannabis effects from co-occurring risk factors.

How to read the evidence

Moderate: registered systematic review with clear methodology, though limited by small number of qualifying studies and poor exposure quantification.

When this study was published

2025 study

The bigger picture

The age-dependent pattern, with problems emerging more clearly after age 2, has important implications for early screening. Children exposed prenatally may appear normal in infancy but develop behavioral and emotional regulation difficulties as developmental demands increase, creating a false sense of reassurance during the first years of life.

Questions still open

  • Do regulatory problems continue to worsen as children age beyond 6? Can early intervention mitigate regulation difficulties in exposed children? Which specific neurobiological mechanisms are most amenable to intervention?

Common questions

Does prenatal cannabis affect children's behavior?
This review found prenatal cannabis exposure is linked to self-regulation problems that tend to become more apparent after age 2, including difficulties with emotional control, attention, and behavior.
Why do problems appear later rather than at birth?
Self-regulation demands increase as children grow. Infants exposed prenatally may show subtle regulatory differences, but the impact becomes clearer when children face greater demands for emotional and behavioral control after age 2.

Read the original research

Systematic review: the impact of maternal pre-and postnatal cannabis use on the behavioral and emotional regulation in early childhood.

European child & adolescent psychiatry, 34(2), 423-463

Citation

Reyentanz, Emely; Gerlach, Jennifer; Kuitunen-Paul, Sören; Golub, Yulia. (2025). Systematic review: the impact of maternal pre-and postnatal cannabis use on the behavioral and emotional regulation in early childhood.. European child & adolescent psychiatry, 34(2), 423-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-024-02494-8

Explore the wider topic