Prenatal Cannabis Exposure Was Not Linked to Developmental Delays at Age 2

Prenatal cannabis use was not significantly associated with cognitive, motor, or language development at age 2 in a large Canadian cohort, with an unexpected positive association with language in girls.

Pleau, Justine et al.·Maternal and child health journal·2025·Moderate EvidenceProspective Cohort
RTHC-07381Prospective CohortModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Prospective Cohort
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

In 1,489 mother-infant dyads from the 3D prospective cohort, prenatal cannabis use (2.6% of women) showed no significant associations with cognitive (B=0.016), fine motor (B=0.029), gross motor (B=0.060), or language development (B=0.200) at age 2. An unexpected positive association between cannabis use and language development was found in girls only.

Key Numbers

1,489 mother-infant dyads analyzed. 2.6% of women used cannabis during pregnancy. Most users stopped after first trimester. No significant associations with any developmental domain. Positive language association in girls only.

How They Did This

Data from 1,489 dyads in the 3D prospective pregnancy cohort (2010-2012). Prenatal cannabis use was measured via interviews each trimester. Child development was assessed using Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (BSID-III) for cognition and motor skills, and MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories for language at age 2. Multiple linear regressions with sex-stratified analyses were performed.

Why This Research Matters

Concerns about prenatal cannabis effects on child development are widespread, but this large prospective study found no measurable impact at age 2. The use of clinician-administered developmental assessments rather than parent report strengthens the findings, though the majority of exposed women stopped after the first trimester.

The Bigger Picture

This study adds to mixed evidence on prenatal cannabis effects. The lack of association at age 2 does not rule out later-emerging effects, as some neurodevelopmental impacts may not manifest until school age. The low prevalence of use and early cessation in most users may also limit the ability to detect effects of heavier or sustained exposure.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Self-reported cannabis use (no biomarker confirmation) likely underestimates true exposure. Only 2.6% reported use, limiting statistical power. Most users stopped after first trimester. Age 2 assessment may be too early to detect subtler cognitive effects. No measure of dose or potency.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would effects emerge at school age when cognitive demands increase?
  • ?Would results differ with biomarker-confirmed exposure or in populations with higher-potency products?
  • ?What explains the unexpected positive language association in girls?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
No significant developmental associations at age 2
Evidence Grade:
Moderate: large prospective cohort (N=1,489) with validated clinical assessments, though self-reported exposure and early assessment age limit conclusions.
Study Age:
2025 study (data from 2010-2012)
Original Title:
Longitudinal Associations Between Cannabis Use during Pregnancy and Child Cognitive, Motor, and Language Development at 2 Years Old.
Published In:
Maternal and child health journal, 29(4), 549-562 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-07381

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-ControlFollows or compares groups over time
This study
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Enrolls participants and follows them forward in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Did prenatal cannabis affect children's brain development?

At age 2, there were no significant differences in cognitive, motor, or language development between cannabis-exposed and unexposed children. However, effects may emerge at later ages when cognitive demands increase.

Why was there a positive language association in girls?

The unexpected finding that prenatal cannabis exposure was linked to better language development in girls was not hypothesized and may reflect chance, unmeasured confounders, or a genuine sex-specific effect requiring replication.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-07381·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-07381

APA

Pleau, Justine; Tanguay, Noémie; Courtemanche, Yohann; Séguin, Jean R; Herba, Catherine M; Simard, Marie-Noelle; MacLeod, Andrea A N; Fraser, William D; Muckle, Gina. (2025). Longitudinal Associations Between Cannabis Use during Pregnancy and Child Cognitive, Motor, and Language Development at 2 Years Old.. Maternal and child health journal, 29(4), 549-562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04077-8

MLA

Pleau, Justine, et al. "Longitudinal Associations Between Cannabis Use during Pregnancy and Child Cognitive, Motor, and Language Development at 2 Years Old.." Maternal and child health journal, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04077-8

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Longitudinal Associations Between Cannabis Use during Pregna..." RTHC-07381. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/pleau-2025-longitudinal-associations-between-cannabis

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.