84 of 99 Brain Imaging Studies Found Cannabis Changes Young Brains

A scoping review of 99 neuroimaging studies found that 85% reported differences in brain structure, function, or chemistry in adolescent and young adult cannabis users compared to non-users, though research quality was generally low.

Nosko, Lilith et al.·Frontiers in psychiatry·2025·Moderate EvidenceScoping Review
RTHC-07264Scoping ReviewModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Scoping Review
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
N=99

What This Study Found

Of 99 studies meeting inclusion criteria (from 3,901 initially screened), 84 (85%) found differences in brain structure, function, and/or metabolite concentrations in cannabis users aged 14-25 compared to non-using controls. Only 5 studies explicitly assessed sex/gender differences, with all 5 finding that sex influenced the effect of cannabis on the brain.

Key Numbers

3,901 sources screened; 99 included; 84/99 (85%) found brain differences; 5 studies examined sex differences, all 5 found effects; ages 14-25.

How They Did This

Scoping review following standard methodology, searching databases for neuroimaging studies assessing effects of cannabis use between ages 14-25 on brain structure, function, and metabolite concentrations. Yielded 3,901 sources, of which 99 met inclusion criteria.

Why This Research Matters

The sheer volume of studies finding brain differences (85%) makes a strong case that cannabis use during adolescence and young adulthood is associated with detectable brain changes. However, the review also highlights that the existing research is of generally low quality and lacks long-term follow-up.

The Bigger Picture

This review provides a comprehensive map of the neuroimaging evidence on youth cannabis use, covering structural MRI, fMRI, and MRS studies. While the weight of evidence points to cannabis-associated brain changes in young people, the low quality of individual studies and lack of longitudinal data mean definitive causal conclusions remain elusive.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Scoping review does not assess study quality or synthesize effect sizes. The 85% figure includes studies of varying quality and rigor. Publication bias may inflate the proportion of positive findings. Most studies are cross-sectional, limiting causal inference. Heterogeneous methodology makes direct comparisons difficult.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Are the observed brain differences clinically meaningful?
  • ?Do they resolve with cessation?
  • ?Why have so few studies examined sex differences?
  • ?What would high-quality longitudinal studies show?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
85% of 99 brain imaging studies found differences in young cannabis users vs non-users
Evidence Grade:
Moderate: Comprehensive scoping review covering 99 studies with consistent findings, but low quality of underlying studies and publication bias concerns temper the strength of conclusions.
Study Age:
Published in 2025.
Original Title:
Cannabis use in adolescence and young adulthood and its effects on brain structure and function: a scoping review.
Published In:
Frontiers in psychiatry, 16, 1644105 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-07264

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Maps out the available research on a broad question.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this prove cannabis damages young brains?

The review found that 85% of brain imaging studies detected differences in young cannabis users, which is a consistent signal. However, most studies are cross-sectional (cannot prove causation), and the review notes that research quality is generally low. Brain differences do not necessarily equal brain damage.

Why does age matter for cannabis brain effects?

Ages 14-25 represent a critical period of brain development, particularly in the prefrontal cortex, which handles decision-making and impulse control. Cannabis may interfere with this development in ways that would not occur in a fully mature brain.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-07264·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-07264

APA

Nosko, Lilith; Crocker, Candice E; Tibbo, Phil G. (2025). Cannabis use in adolescence and young adulthood and its effects on brain structure and function: a scoping review.. Frontiers in psychiatry, 16, 1644105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1644105

MLA

Nosko, Lilith, et al. "Cannabis use in adolescence and young adulthood and its effects on brain structure and function: a scoping review.." Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1644105

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Cannabis use in adolescence and young adulthood and its effe..." RTHC-07264. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/nosko-2025-cannabis-use-in-adolescence

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.