rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

School Discipline Style Did Not Directly Affect Student Cannabis Use in Canada

Cross SectionalModerate evidence
The takeaway

None of the school cannabis disciplinary approaches studied were directly associated with student cannabis use, but students at supportive schools were more likely to perceive their school as helpful and less likely to use cannabis.

School administrators, education policymakers, parents

68,037 students across 131 Canadian schools

What the researchers found

Across 131 Canadian schools and 68,037 students, no school discipline style (permissive, authoritarian, etc.) was directly associated with cannabis use. However, students at permissive/supportive schools were more likely to perceive their school as supportive for substance use prevention, and students who perceived their school as supportive were less likely to use cannabis.

Why it matters

This was the first year after cannabis legalization in Canada. Understanding whether school discipline approaches affect student cannabis use has direct policy implications for how schools should respond.

The numbers in context

68,037 students; 131 Canadian secondary schools; grades 9-12; first school year after legalization

How the study worked

Cross-sectional analysis of school- and student-level data from Year 7 (2018/2019) of the COMPASS study. Schools were classified by administrator-reported disciplinary approaches to first-offense cannabis violations.

What this study cannot tell us

Cross-sectional design cannot establish causation. School classification based on administrator reports may not reflect actual implementation. One-year snapshot post-legalization.

How to read the evidence

Very large sample with school-level classification, but cross-sectional design and indirect pathway to cannabis use outcomes.

When this study was published

Published in 2022

The bigger picture

Punitive approaches to school cannabis policy may not reduce use, but supportive approaches that make students feel helped rather than punished appear to have an indirect protective effect through changing perceptions.

Questions still open

  • Would longitudinal data show that supportive discipline reduces cannabis use over time? Do the indirect effects through perception translate into meaningful differences in use rates?

Common questions

Does strict school discipline reduce student cannabis use?
This study found no direct association between any school disciplinary approach and student cannabis use. However, students at supportive schools perceived their school as more helpful, which was linked to lower use.
What school approach works best for cannabis prevention?
The study suggested supportive approaches (counseling referrals, educational programs) may work indirectly by making students feel supported, which was associated with lower cannabis use, while punitive approaches showed no direct benefit.

Read the original research

The Relations between Youth Cannabis Use, School Cannabis Use-Related Disciplinary Approaches and Student Perceptions of School Support.

Substance use & misuse, 57(6), 897-910

Citation

Magier, Megan J; Leatherdale, Scott T; Wade, Terrance J; Patte, Karen A. (2022). The Relations between Youth Cannabis Use, School Cannabis Use-Related Disciplinary Approaches and Student Perceptions of School Support.. Substance use & misuse, 57(6), 897-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2022.2052097

Explore the wider topic