An MRI study comparing 15 chronic synthetic cannabinoid users to 15 controls found reduced total gray matter volume, reduced volume in multiple cortical regions, and diminished brain activation during a working memory task in the user group.
Neuroscience researchers studying synthetic cannabinoid effects; addiction clinicians; public health officials assessing synthetic cannabinoid harms.
First study showing both structural and functional brain changes in chronic synthetic cannabinoid users
What the researchers found
Fifteen chronic synthetic cannabinoid (SC) users and 15 healthy controls underwent MRI scans while performing cognitive tasks.
SC users showed reduced total gray matter volume compared to controls, along with reduced volume in specific regions: middle frontal gyrus, frontal orbital gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus.
On a working memory task (N-back), SC users performed worse behaviorally and showed diminished brain activation in the precuneus, cuneus, lingual gyrus, hippocampus, and cerebellum.
On a response inhibition task (Go-No-Go), no group differences were found in either performance or brain activation.
This was the first study showing both overall and region-specific gray matter volume reductions in chronic SC users, and the first to demonstrate impaired neural mechanisms for working memory specifically.
Why it matters
Synthetic cannabinoids are far more potent than natural cannabis and their brain effects are poorly understood. This study provides the first neuroimaging evidence of structural and functional brain changes in chronic SC users, suggesting vulnerability of the frontal-parietal network that supports working memory.
The numbers in context
15 SC users, 15 controls. Reduced gray matter in middle frontal gyrus, frontal orbital gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, insula, anterior cingulate, and precuneus. Diminished activation during N-back in precuneus, cuneus, lingual gyrus, hippocampus, and cerebellum.
How the study worked
Cross-sectional neuroimaging study. 15 SC users vs 15 controls. Structural MRI for gray matter volume. Functional MRI during N-back (working memory) and Go-No-Go (response inhibition) tasks.
What this study cannot tell us
Very small sample (15 per group). Cross-sectional design cannot determine whether brain differences preceded or resulted from SC use. SC users likely used other substances as well. No data on specific SC compounds used, doses, or duration.
How to read the evidence
Preliminary. Novel first-of-its-kind findings, but very small sample size limits confidence and generalizability.
When this study was published
Published in 2018. Synthetic cannabinoid neuroimaging research remains limited but continues to develop.
The bigger picture
Synthetic cannabinoids represent a much more potent class of compounds than THC. If 15 chronic users already show measurable brain changes, this raises concerns about the neurological impact of the SC epidemic, particularly among young users.
Questions still open
- Are these brain changes reversible with abstinence? Do they differ from changes seen with natural cannabis use? Which specific synthetic cannabinoids cause the most brain damage? Do these structural changes predict functional outcomes?
Common questions
Are synthetic cannabinoids worse for the brain than regular cannabis?
What is the N-back task?
Read the original research
The effects of synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) on brain structure and function.
European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 28(9), 1047-1057
Citation
Livny, A; Cohen, K; Tik, N; Tsarfaty, G; Rosca, P; Weinstein, A. (2018). The effects of synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) on brain structure and function.. European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 28(9), 1047-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.07.095
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?