Newton screening tool shows high specificity for detecting cannabis use disorder in teens visiting the ER
The Newton screen had 93.1% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity for cannabis use disorder in adolescents presenting to pediatric emergency departments, making it a practical brief screening tool.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
For cannabis use disorder, the Newton screen achieved baseline sensitivity of 93.1% and specificity of 93.5%. For alcohol use disorder, sensitivity was 78.3% with 93.0% specificity. Predictive validity at 1-3 year follow-up showed high specificity but lower sensitivity for both substances.
Key Numbers
4,898 adolescents across 16 EDs; cannabis screening sensitivity 93.1%, specificity 93.5%; alcohol screening sensitivity 78.3%, specificity 93.0%; predictive validity maintained high specificity at 1-3 year follow-up.
How They Did This
Validation study within 16 pediatric emergency departments (PECARN network) enrolling 4,898 adolescents aged 12-17. Concurrent validity assessed against structured DSM-based interviews. Convergent validity tested against AUDIT. Predictive validity assessed at 1, 2, and 3 years.
Why This Research Matters
Emergency departments see adolescents who might not otherwise encounter substance use screening. A brief, validated tool that works in the chaotic ED environment could identify at-risk teens and connect them with early intervention.
The Bigger Picture
Brief screening tools are only useful if they are accurate and practical. The Newton screen's strong performance for cannabis, especially the high sensitivity that catches most true cases, addresses a real clinical need in pediatric emergency settings.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Higher sensitivity for cannabis than alcohol may reflect the tool's design or differences in adolescent substance use patterns. Predictive sensitivity was lower at follow-up, suggesting it may miss some who develop problems later. ED populations may differ from general adolescent populations.
Questions This Raises
- ?Could this tool be adapted for primary care settings?
- ?Does early identification through ED screening translate to better substance use outcomes?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- 93% sensitivity and specificity
- Evidence Grade:
- Moderate: large multi-site validation study with follow-up, though limited to ED populations.
- Study Age:
- Published in 2019.
- Original Title:
- Reliability and Validity of the Newton Screen for Alcohol and Cannabis Misuse in a Pediatric Emergency Department Sample.
- Published In:
- The Journal of pediatrics, 210, 154-160.e1 (2019)
- Authors:
- Linakis, James G(2), Bromberg, Julie R(2), Casper, T Charles(2), Chun, Thomas H, Mello, Michael J, Ingebretsen, Hailey, Spirito, Anthony
- Database ID:
- RTHC-02140
Evidence Hierarchy
A snapshot of a population at one point in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Newton screen?
It is a brief screening tool designed for busy clinical environments that can identify alcohol and cannabis use disorders in adolescents.
Is the tool better at detecting cannabis or alcohol problems?
The Newton screen performed better for cannabis (93.1% sensitivity) than alcohol (78.3% sensitivity), though specificity was high for both.
Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-02140APA
Linakis, James G; Bromberg, Julie R; Casper, T Charles; Chun, Thomas H; Mello, Michael J; Ingebretsen, Hailey; Spirito, Anthony. (2019). Reliability and Validity of the Newton Screen for Alcohol and Cannabis Misuse in a Pediatric Emergency Department Sample.. The Journal of pediatrics, 210, 154-160.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.038
MLA
Linakis, James G, et al. "Reliability and Validity of the Newton Screen for Alcohol and Cannabis Misuse in a Pediatric Emergency Department Sample.." The Journal of pediatrics, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.038
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Reliability and Validity of the Newton Screen for Alcohol an..." RTHC-02140. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/linakis-2019-reliability-and-validity-of
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.