Depression and Cannabis Use May Share Brain Reward Processing Deficits, But Evidence Is Inconsistent
A systematic review found that anhedonia in depression and amotivation in cannabis use involve similar brain regions (anterior cingulate, nucleus accumbens, medial prefrontal cortex) but no consistent biomarkers have been identified.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Across 46 articles, brain regions most frequently associated with anhedonia across neuroimaging studies were the anterior cingulate cortex, nucleus accumbens, and medial prefrontal cortex, which are the same regions implicated in cannabis-related reward processing deficits. However, no biochemical marker (including IL-6 and CRP) was consistently associated with anhedonia, and only 2 articles specifically examined amotivation in cannabis use. Study designs and anhedonia measures were highly heterogeneous.
Key Numbers
46 articles included (44 on depression/anhedonia, 2 on cannabis/amotivation); key brain regions: anterior cingulate cortex, nucleus accumbens, medial prefrontal cortex; no consistent biochemical biomarkers found
How They Did This
Systematic review searching 8 electronic databases. Included original research on biological factors or behavioral tasks associated with anhedonia in depression (44 articles) or amotivation in cannabis use (2 articles). PROSPERO-registered.
Why This Research Matters
The neurobiological overlap between depression-related anhedonia and cannabis-related amotivation could inform shared treatment approaches. Understanding these deficits in adolescents may be particularly important given the co-development of mood disorders and cannabis use during this period.
The Bigger Picture
The "amotivational syndrome" long attributed to cannabis use and the anhedonia of depression may share common neurobiological roots in disrupted reward processing. Identifying shared mechanisms could unlock treatments that address both conditions simultaneously.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Overwhelmingly focused on depression (44 studies) vs cannabis (only 2 studies). Heterogeneous study designs prevent quantitative synthesis. Most anhedonia measures were self-report. Small sample sizes in many included studies. Cannot determine if shared brain regions reflect shared pathology or coincidental overlap.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would treatments targeting reward processing deficits improve both depression and cannabis-related amotivation?
- ?Why has cannabis-related amotivation received so little rigorous biological investigation?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Evidence Grade:
- Moderate: systematic review with PROSPERO registration, but limited by extreme imbalance in literature (44 vs 2 studies) and heterogeneous methods.
- Study Age:
- 2025 publication
- Original Title:
- A Systematic Review: Investigating Biomarkers of Anhedonia and Amotivation in Depression and Cannabis Use.
- Published In:
- JAACAP open, 3(3), 379-405 (2025)
- Authors:
- Hinckley, Jesse D(6), Conner, Bradley T(5), Mauch, Roseanne, Arkfeld, Patrice A, Bhatia, Devika, Smith, Emma E, Svoboda, Ellie, Singh, Manpreet K
- Database ID:
- RTHC-06663
Evidence Hierarchy
Analyzes all available research on a topic using a structured method.
What do these levels mean? →Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06663APA
Hinckley, Jesse D; Conner, Bradley T; Mauch, Roseanne; Arkfeld, Patrice A; Bhatia, Devika; Smith, Emma E; Svoboda, Ellie; Singh, Manpreet K. (2025). A Systematic Review: Investigating Biomarkers of Anhedonia and Amotivation in Depression and Cannabis Use.. JAACAP open, 3(3), 379-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.08.005
MLA
Hinckley, Jesse D, et al. "A Systematic Review: Investigating Biomarkers of Anhedonia and Amotivation in Depression and Cannabis Use.." JAACAP open, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.08.005
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "A Systematic Review: Investigating Biomarkers of Anhedonia a..." RTHC-06663. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/hinckley-2025-a-systematic-review-investigating
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.