A clinical study of 44 ED patients who used AB-CHMINACA or MDMB-CHMICA found that these newer synthetic cannabinoids produced more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms than earlier generations, including seizures (27%), prolonged symptoms (34% lasting 24+ hours), and severe poisoning in 20%.
Read this if you want to understand why newer synthetic cannabinoids are more dangerous than earlier products.
27% had seizures; 34% had symptoms lasting 24+ hours
What the researchers found
Researchers prospectively studied 44 patients treated in emergency departments after using synthetic cannabinoids, with lab confirmation of AB-CHMINACA and/or MDMB-CHMICA in blood or urine.
Based on the Poison Severity Score, poisoning severity was minor in 4 cases, moderate in 31 cases, and severe in 9 cases (20%).
The most common neuropsychiatric symptoms were CNS depression (61%), disorientation (45%), generalized seizures (27%), combativeness (18%), and extreme agitation (16%). Symptoms lasted 24 hours or longer in 34% of cases.
These rates were notably higher than those previously reported for earlier-generation synthetic cannabinoids (aminoalkylindole-type like JWH-018). The authors concluded that these "third generation" synthetic cannabinoids appear to be associated with more severe clinical toxicity.
In 19 of 44 cases, more than one synthetic cannabinoid was detected, complicating attribution of effects to specific compounds.
Why it matters
As synthetic cannabinoid chemistry evolves, each new generation appears to carry increased risk. The finding that third-generation compounds produce more seizures, more severe poisoning, and longer symptom duration than earlier generations is a critical public health warning.
The numbers in context
44 patients (39 male, 5 female, ages 12-48). AB-CHMINACA detected in 20 serum samples, MDMB-CHMICA in 19. Severe poisoning: 20%. Seizures: 27%. Symptoms 24+ hours: 34%. CNS depression: 61%. Disorientation: 45%. Multiple SCs in 19 cases.
How the study worked
Prospective observational study of patients in EDs after synthetic cannabinoid use. Clinical and lab data reported to poison control centre. Serum and/or urine analyzed by LC-MS/MS. 44 patients (39 male, 5 female, ages 12-48). Severity graded by Poison Severity Score.
What this study cannot tell us
In 19 of 44 cases, multiple synthetic cannabinoids were present, making it difficult to attribute effects to specific compounds. Other psychoactive substances were found in 7 cases. Prospective design at select EDs may not capture all presentations. The sample size limits generalization about specific compounds.
How to read the evidence
Prospective observational study with analytical confirmation of specific compounds provides moderate evidence on the clinical toxicity of these third-generation synthetic cannabinoids.
When this study was published
Published in 2018. New synthetic cannabinoid compounds have continued to emerge, and toxicity profiles continue to evolve.
The bigger picture
The rapid turnover of synthetic cannabinoid compounds on the drug market means that users face an evolving and increasingly dangerous chemical landscape. Each new generation of compounds can be more potent and toxic than the last, with effects that are difficult to predict from earlier products.
Questions still open
- Will fourth-generation synthetic cannabinoids be even more toxic? What specific pharmacological properties make newer compounds more dangerous? Should synthetic cannabinoid presentations be managed differently based on generation?
Common questions
Are newer synthetic cannabinoids more dangerous?
What are the main symptoms?
Read the original research
Acute side effects after consumption of the new synthetic cannabinoids AB-CHMINACA and MDMB-CHMICA.
Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 56(6), 404-411
Citation
Hermanns-Clausen, Maren; Müller, Dieter; Kithinji, Josephine; Angerer, Verena; Franz, Florian; Eyer, Florian; Neurath, Hartmud; Liebetrau, Gesine; Auwärter, Volker. (2018). Acute side effects after consumption of the new synthetic cannabinoids AB-CHMINACA and MDMB-CHMICA.. Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 56(6), 404-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2017.1393082
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?