Bias-Based Bullying Linked to Much Higher Cannabis Use Among Minority Youth
Adolescents with minoritized identities who experienced bullying based on their identity used cannabis at rates 50-68% higher than peers with the same identities who were not bullied.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Among 82,933 Minnesota students, regular cannabis use prevalence was dramatically higher among youth with minoritized identities who experienced bias-based bullying compared to peers with the same identities who did not. For example, 18% of 8th graders who had low resources, identified as American Indian/Alaska Native/multiracial, and experienced SOGIE-based bullying used cannabis regularly, versus 6.8% of similar youth without bullying. This 50-68% reduction in cannabis use among non-bullied youth held across grades.
Key Numbers
82,933 students; cannabis use 50-68% lower among non-bullied youth with same identities; 18% vs 6.8% among 8th graders who were AI/AN/multiracial with low resources and SOGIE bullying vs without
How They Did This
Cross-sectional analysis of the 2022 Minnesota Student Survey (8th, 9th, and 11th graders, N=82,933). Used exhaustive CHAID (Chi-square automatic interaction detection) to identify combinations of social positions and bullying experiences associated with highest cannabis use prevalence.
Why This Research Matters
This reframes adolescent cannabis use as partially driven by discrimination experiences rather than purely individual risk factors. It suggests that anti-bullying interventions could have downstream effects on substance use, particularly for youth with multiple minoritized identities.
The Bigger Picture
Substance use prevention typically focuses on individual decision-making. This research suggests that structural factors like bias-based bullying create environments that drive cannabis use among the most marginalized youth.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Cross-sectional design cannot establish causality. Self-report data. Minnesota-specific sample may not generalize nationally. Binary bullying measure (any vs none) does not capture severity or frequency.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would anti-bullying interventions measurably reduce cannabis use among targeted youth?
- ?Do these patterns hold for other substances or primarily cannabis?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Evidence Grade:
- Moderate: very large sample with sophisticated statistical methods, but cross-sectional design and single state.
- Study Age:
- 2025 study using 2022 survey data
- Original Title:
- The role of bias-based bullying in regular cannabis use among adolescents.
- Published In:
- Addictive behaviors, 170, 108441 (2025)
- Authors:
- Gower, Amy L(2), Watson, Ryan J(2), Pieczykolan, Lauren Love, Eisenberg, Marla E
- Database ID:
- RTHC-06574
Evidence Hierarchy
A snapshot of a population at one point in time.
What do these levels mean? →Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06574APA
Gower, Amy L; Watson, Ryan J; Pieczykolan, Lauren Love; Eisenberg, Marla E. (2025). The role of bias-based bullying in regular cannabis use among adolescents.. Addictive behaviors, 170, 108441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108441
MLA
Gower, Amy L, et al. "The role of bias-based bullying in regular cannabis use among adolescents.." Addictive behaviors, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108441
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "The role of bias-based bullying in regular cannabis use amon..." RTHC-06574. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/gower-2025-the-role-of-biasbased
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.