A snapshot survey of the surface web found 62 websites selling 128 brands of synthetic cannabinoid vaping products, with misleading safety disclaimers, bulk discount incentives, and median prices of just 3.39 per mL.
Drug policy regulators considering online sales restrictions; emergency physicians recognizing vaping-related synthetic cannabinoid presentations.
128 SCRA vaping brands across 62 websites with bulk discounts
What the researchers found
62 websites sold 128 SCRA vaping brands. Most were purportedly US-based (66%). Purchase incentives included discreet packaging (61%), bulk discounts (55%), and tracked delivery (48%). Misleading disclaimers included "not for human consumption" (66%), "research purposes only" (24%), and claims products were "legal" (45%). 99.6% were liquid products. Price decreased with volume: 6.58/mL for small quantities, 1.60/mL for bulk.
Why it matters
Synthetic cannabinoid vaping products are easily accessible on the regular internet (not dark web), marketed with misleading safety claims, and available in bulk at low prices. This accessibility, combined with their extreme potency and toxicity, represents a public health concern.
The numbers in context
62 websites. 128 SCRA vaping brands. Median 16 brands per website. 99.6% liquid form. Most common bottle: 5 mL. Median price: 3.39/mL. Bulk pricing: 1.60/mL for >200 mL. 66% claimed "not for human consumption." 45% claimed products were "legal."
How the study worked
Internet snapshot survey using Google searches with five relevant search terms between October 2022 and January 2023. Products, pricing, branding, and disclaimers were catalogued from identified websites.
What this study cannot tell us
Snapshot from October 2022-January 2023; market may have changed. Could not verify product contents or actual SCRA concentrations. Focused on UK-accessible websites. Search terms may not capture all available products. Cannot determine actual sales volumes.
How to read the evidence
Systematic internet survey providing market landscape data, though product contents were not chemically verified.
When this study was published
2024 study
The bigger picture
The "not for human consumption" and "research purposes only" disclaimers are a known regulatory loophole that has persisted for years. The availability of bulk quantities at steep discounts suggests both individual and distribution-level purchasing.
Questions still open
- What specific SCRAs are in these products? Are website claims about legality accurate? What proportion of ER visits for synthetic cannabinoid toxicity trace to online purchases?
Common questions
What are synthetic cannabinoids?
How can these be sold legally?
Read the original research
An Internet Snapshot Survey Assessing the sale of Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists for use with Electronic Vaping Devices.
Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 20(3), 271-277
Citation
Gould, Allon; Dargan, Paul I; Wood, David M. (2024). An Internet Snapshot Survey Assessing the sale of Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists for use with Electronic Vaping Devices.. Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology, 20(3), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-024-01013-0
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?