rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Children in states with legal recreational cannabis did not perceive cannabis as less risky than children in states where it was illegal

ObservationalStrong evidence
The takeaway

Among 10,395 children aged 9-10 tracked over 3 years in the ABCD Study, living in a state with recreational cannabis laws had no significant effect on their perception of cannabis risk, even after controlling for demographics, impulsivity, and religiosity.

Cannabis policy researchers and legislators; child development specialists studying substance use attitudes.

10,395 children; no legalization effect on cannabis risk perception

What the researchers found

There was no significant main effect of state recreational cannabis laws on perceived risk of cannabis use among children, and no differences in how risk perception changed over time between states with and without legalization. These null findings persisted after controlling for sex, race, SES, religiosity, and trait impulsivity.

Why it matters

A major concern about cannabis legalization is that it will normalize cannabis for children. This large, nationally representative study finds no evidence that state-level legalization laws change how children perceive cannabis risk, at least in the 9-13 age range.

The numbers in context

10,395 children from the ABCD Study. Ages 9-10 at baseline. 3-year follow-up. No significant main effect of state recreational cannabis laws (RCLs) on risk perception. No significant time-by-RCL interaction.

How the study worked

Multilevel regression analysis of ABCD Study data. 10,395 children aged 9-10 at baseline assessed longitudinally across 3 years. Multilevel modeling accounted for state-, family-, and participant-level clustering.

What this study cannot tell us

Assessed risk perception, not actual use behavior. Children aged 9-13 may be too young for legalization to affect their attitudes. Perception may shift during adolescence when cannabis becomes more socially relevant. Cannot account for local-level variation within states.

How to read the evidence

Large nationally representative longitudinal sample with rigorous multilevel modeling and appropriate controls.

When this study was published

2024 study

The bigger picture

While legalization may affect adult attitudes and use patterns, this study suggests that children's risk perceptions are shaped more by family, individual traits, and developmental factors than by state-level legal status, at least during late childhood.

Questions still open

  • Does the relationship change during adolescence when cannabis use becomes more accessible? Do parental attitudes mediate any potential legalization effects?

Common questions

Does this mean legalization is safe for children?
This study only measured risk perception in 9-13 year olds, not use behavior or health outcomes. Children in legal states did not view cannabis as less risky, but other measures of impact were not assessed.
Might this change as children get older?
Possibly. The study followed children from ages 9-10 to about 12-13. As children enter mid-adolescence when cannabis use initiation is more common, state legalization status may start to influence their attitudes.

Read the original research

State-Level Recreational Cannabis Legalization Is Not Differentially Associated with Cannabis Risk Perception Among Children: A Multilevel Regression Analysis.

Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 9(1), 343-352

Citation

Gilman, Jodi M; Iyer, Mallika T; Pottinger, Emma G; Klugman, Emma M; Hughes, Dylan; Potter, Kevin; Tervo-Clemmens, Brenden; Roffman, Joshua L; Evins, A Eden. (2024). State-Level Recreational Cannabis Legalization Is Not Differentially Associated with Cannabis Risk Perception Among Children: A Multilevel Regression Analysis.. Cannabis and cannabinoid research, 9(1), 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1089/can.2022.0162

Explore the wider topic