Having a Family Member in Prison Linked to Earlier and More Frequent Substance Use in Teens

Adolescents with incarcerated family members had 63% higher odds of early cannabis initiation and 71% higher odds of current use, beyond other adverse childhood experiences.

Forster, Myriam et al.·Addictive behaviors·2025·Moderate EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-06477Cross SectionalModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Using coarsened exact matching, family incarceration was associated with higher odds of early cannabis initiation (OR=1.63), past 30-day cannabis (OR=1.71), early alcohol initiation (OR=2.54), current alcohol (OR=2.11), and nicotine (OR=1.72).

Key Numbers

Early cannabis: OR=1.63 (1.03-2.59). Current cannabis: OR=1.71 (1.17-2.48). Early alcohol: OR=2.54 (1.64-3.90). Current alcohol: OR=2.11 (1.50-2.94). Nicotine: OR=1.72 (1.21-2.45).

How They Did This

Baseline survey of high school students. Coarsened exact matching balanced groups on other ACEs, demographics, and SES.

Why This Research Matters

Family incarceration affects millions of children disproportionately in communities of color. This isolates its unique contribution to substance use beyond other adversities.

The Bigger Picture

Mass incarceration creates generational ripple effects. Understanding substance use consequences can inform criminal justice reform and youth prevention.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cross-sectional baseline. Self-reported. Cannot determine which family member or duration. Matching cannot eliminate all confounding.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would family support programs during incarceration reduce youth substance use?
  • ?Does type or duration of incarceration matter?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
71% higher odds of current cannabis use with family incarceration
Evidence Grade:
Well-matched analysis isolating family incarceration, but cross-sectional.
Study Age:
2025 study
Original Title:
Family incarceration and adolescent nicotine, alcohol, and cannabis use: A coarsened exact matching approach.
Published In:
Addictive behaviors, 164, 108270 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06477

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

How is family incarceration different from other childhood traumas?

This study used matching to show it has an independent effect on substance use beyond what other traumas explain.

Which substances were most affected?

Early alcohol initiation had the strongest association (2.54x odds), followed by current alcohol (2.11x), nicotine (1.72x), current cannabis (1.71x), and early cannabis (1.63x).

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06477·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06477

APA

Forster, Myriam; Shaverdi, Abnous; Zhang, Xiao; Toledo-Corral, Claudia M; Grigsby, Timothy J. (2025). Family incarceration and adolescent nicotine, alcohol, and cannabis use: A coarsened exact matching approach.. Addictive behaviors, 164, 108270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108270

MLA

Forster, Myriam, et al. "Family incarceration and adolescent nicotine, alcohol, and cannabis use: A coarsened exact matching approach.." Addictive behaviors, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2025.108270

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Family incarceration and adolescent nicotine, alcohol, and c..." RTHC-06477. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/forster-2025-family-incarceration-and-adolescent

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.