A review of clinical reports found that synthetic cannabinoids induce psychotic symptoms including new-onset psychosis and relapses, with effects that are more complex and potentially more dangerous than those of natural cannabis.
Read this if you want to understand why synthetic cannabinoids carry different and potentially greater psychosis risks than natural cannabis.
SCs are full agonists at cannabinoid receptors; THC is a partial agonist
What the researchers found
Researchers reviewed the clinical literature on psychotic symptoms following synthetic cannabinoid (SC) use.
Multiple clinical reports documented induction of psychotic symptoms after consuming SC products, including both new-onset psychosis in people with no psychiatric history and psychotic relapses in those with prior episodes.
The review found that the relationship between SCs and psychosis is more complex than any single chemical component can explain. Unlike natural cannabis, SC products contain a constantly changing mix of potent full agonists at cannabinoid receptors, compared to THC which is a partial agonist.
The authors concluded that the psychotic effects of SCs may not be a simple extension of the typical effects of cannabis or natural cannabinoids, warranting distinct clinical consideration.
Why it matters
Synthetic cannabinoids are often misleadingly marketed as cannabis alternatives, but their pharmacology is fundamentally different and more dangerous. Understanding that SC-related psychosis operates through distinct mechanisms helps clinicians recognize and treat these cases appropriately.
The numbers in context
SCs broadly impact psychological state (mood, suicidal thoughts, psychosis) and physiological functions (cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, urinary). Products have gained popularity as abused drugs over the past decade across many countries.
How the study worked
Literature review of clinical reports, case studies, and pharmacological research on synthetic cannabinoid products and their association with psychotic symptoms, including analysis of chemical mechanisms.
What this study cannot tell us
Much of the evidence comes from case reports and clinical observations rather than controlled studies. The constantly changing chemical composition of SC products makes it difficult to attribute effects to specific compounds. Confounding from polysubstance use is common in clinical reports.
How to read the evidence
This review synthesizes clinical reports and pharmacological research, providing moderate evidence on the distinct psychosis risk profile of synthetic cannabinoids.
When this study was published
Published in 2018. New synthetic cannabinoid compounds continue to emerge, and the specific products available have changed since publication.
The bigger picture
The distinction between synthetic and natural cannabinoids is clinically important. SCs are full agonists at cannabinoid receptors while THC is a partial agonist, which means SCs can produce much stronger receptor activation. This pharmacological difference likely explains why SC-related psychosis appears more severe and unpredictable than cannabis-related psychosis.
Questions still open
- Which specific synthetic cannabinoid compounds carry the highest psychosis risk? Do SC-induced psychotic episodes have different long-term outcomes than cannabis-induced episodes? Should clinical guidelines for substance-induced psychosis differentiate between natural and synthetic cannabinoids?
Common questions
Are synthetic cannabinoids the same as cannabis?
Can synthetic cannabinoids cause psychosis in someone with no history?
Read the original research
Psychosis and synthetic cannabinoids.
Psychiatry research, 268, 400-412
Citation
Deng, Huiqiong; Verrico, Christopher D; Kosten, Thomas R; Nielsen, David A. (2018). Psychosis and synthetic cannabinoids.. Psychiatry research, 268, 400-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.012
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?