Four third-generation Spice/K2 compounds showed CB1 receptor binding affinities up to 30 times higher than JWH-018, with greater dopamine-stimulating properties in the brain's reward center.
Toxicologists, emergency clinicians, and anyone tracking the evolving danger of synthetic cannabinoids.
BB-22 had 30x higher CB1 receptor affinity than the earlier synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018
What the researchers found
Researchers characterized four third-generation synthetic cannabinoids (BB-22, 5F-PB-22, 5F-AKB-48, STS-135) and compared them to the earlier compound JWH-018.
BB-22 and 5F-PB-22 had CB1 receptor binding affinities 30 and 26 times higher than JWH-018 respectively, with higher potency and efficacy as CB1 agonists. All four compounds stimulated dopamine release specifically in the nucleus accumbens shell (the brain's reward center) but not in other nearby regions.
The dopamine-stimulating effect was completely blocked by the CB1 antagonist AM251 and showed a bell-shaped dose-response curve. The compounds did not activate G-proteins in CB1 knockout mice, confirming CB1 receptor specificity.
Why it matters
The escalating potency of successive synthetic cannabinoid generations helps explain the increasing severity of clinical toxicity reports. Compounds 30 times more potent than earlier versions pose correspondingly greater risks of overdose and adverse effects.
The numbers in context
BB-22 Ki: 0.11 nM (vs. JWH-018: 3.38 nM). 5F-PB-22 Ki: 0.13 nM. BB-22 Emax: 217% (vs. JWH-018: 163%). All four stimulated nucleus accumbens shell dopamine release at doses consistent with their CB1 affinity.
How the study worked
In vitro receptor binding and GTPgammaS assays on rat and mouse CB1/CB2 receptors. In vivo brain microdialysis in freely moving mice measuring dopamine release in nucleus accumbens shell, core, and medial prefrontal cortex. CB1 knockout mice used for specificity.
What this study cannot tell us
In vitro binding does not perfectly predict in vivo effects. Mouse dopamine studies may not directly translate to human reward processing. Only acute effects were studied. The specific compounds may have been replaced by even newer variants in the illicit market.
How to read the evidence
This is a well-designed pharmacological study combining in vitro and in vivo approaches with appropriate controls, providing strong preclinical characterization.
When this study was published
Published in 2016. The synthetic cannabinoid market has continued to evolve with potentially even more potent compounds.
The bigger picture
This study documents a dangerous trend in the synthetic cannabinoid market: each generation of compounds is more potent than the last. The selective dopamine release in the reward center, combined with super-high potency, helps explain both the addictive potential and the severe toxicity of these substances.
Questions still open
- Is there a ceiling to how potent synthetic cannabinoids can become? Does the bell-shaped dose-response curve for dopamine explain some of the paradoxical effects reported by users?
Common questions
Why are newer synthetic cannabinoids more dangerous?
Why do synthetic cannabinoids release dopamine in the reward center?
Read the original research
Native CB1 receptor affinity, intrinsic activity and accumbens shell dopamine stimulant properties of third generation SPICE/K2 cannabinoids: BB-22, 5F-PB-22, 5F-AKB-48 and STS-135.
Neuropharmacology, 105, 630-638
Citation
De Luca, Maria Antonietta; Castelli, M Paola; Loi, Barbara; Porcu, Alessandra; Martorelli, Mariella; Miliano, Cristina; Kellett, Kathryn; Davidson, Colin; Stair, Jacqueline L; Schifano, Fabrizio; Di Chiara, Gaetano. (2016). Native CB1 receptor affinity, intrinsic activity and accumbens shell dopamine stimulant properties of third generation SPICE/K2 cannabinoids: BB-22, 5F-PB-22, 5F-AKB-48 and STS-135.. Neuropharmacology, 105, 630-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.11.017
Explore the wider topic
- THC Purity and Potency: What the Label Actually Means
- Dab and Concentrate Withdrawal: Why It Hits Harder
- Delta-8 THC: Addiction, Withdrawal, and What We Don't Know
- Edible Addiction and Withdrawal: What Makes It Different
- Edibles and Psychosis: When a Bad Trip Becomes an Emergency
- Vaping vs Smoking vs Edibles: A Harm Reduction Guide
- How Cannabis Products Are Made: From Plant to Concentrate to Edible
- Laced Weed and Contaminated Vapes: Real Risks vs Myths
- Legal vs Street Weed: Quality, Safety, and What You're Actually Smoking
- Quitting Weed Pens and Dabs: Why Concentrates Hit Different
- Quitting Edibles: Is Withdrawal Different from Smoking?
- Sativa vs Indica: The Myth and the Science Behind Cannabis Strain Labels
- Why Is Weed Withdrawal Worse Now Than 20 Years Ago?