Prenatal Cannabis Exposure Linked to Possible Communication Delays at 12 Months, But Finding Did Not Survive Statistical Correction
In a large cohort of over 10,000 pregnancies, prenatal cannabis exposure was associated with increased risk of communication delay at 12 months before adjusting for multiple comparisons, but no other developmental domains were affected.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Prenatal cannabis exposure was not associated with differences in gestational age or birth weight. It was significantly associated with increased risk of parent-reported developmental delay on the communication domain (p = .02), but this finding did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. No other ASQ-3 domains showed significant associations.
Key Numbers
Total sample: 10,695 pregnancies. ASQ-3 assessments: 3,742 infants at 12 months. Cannabis group differed significantly on all sociodemographic variables from non-users. Communication domain association: p = .02 before multiple comparison adjustment, not significant after. No significant associations with gestational age or birth weight (p > .05).
How They Did This
Prospective cohort from the Pregnancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic study (n = 10,695 total; n = 3,742 with 12-month ASQ-3 assessments). Propensity score weighting addressed demographic differences between cannabis-using and non-using groups. G-computations analyzed associations with birth outcomes and developmental delay.
Why This Research Matters
Cannabis use during pregnancy is increasing with legalization, and the developmental consequences remain unclear. This large study found limited evidence of harm at 12 months, with only a borderline signal for communication development that warrants monitoring but does not establish clear risk.
The Bigger Picture
The question of prenatal cannabis safety is one of the most important and unsettled in perinatal research. This study joins a growing literature showing mixed results, with some subtle signals in communication and language development that may emerge more clearly at later ages when language demands increase.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
The study was not specifically designed to examine prenatal cannabis effects. Cannabis use was self-reported and may be underreported. The ASQ-3 is a parent-report screening tool, not a comprehensive developmental assessment. Follow-up at 12 months may be too early to detect some developmental effects. The COVID-19 pandemic context may introduce unique confounders.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would the communication delay signal strengthen at 18 or 24 months when language demands increase?
- ?Does the timing and amount of prenatal cannabis exposure affect developmental outcomes differently?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Communication delay association: p = .02 before correction, not significant after
- Evidence Grade:
- Moderate: large prospective cohort with propensity score weighting, but secondary analysis of a study not designed for this question, parent-reported outcomes, and self-reported exposure.
- Study Age:
- 2024 study using 2021-2022 pandemic-era data.
- Original Title:
- Evaluation of the Association Between Prenatal Cannabis Use and Risk of Developmental Delay.
- Published In:
- JAACAP open, 2(4), 250-262 (2024)
- Authors:
- Watts, Dana, Lebel, Catherine, Chaput, Kathleen, Giesbrecht, Gerald F, Dewsnap, Kyle, Baglot, Samantha L, Tomfohr-Madsen, Lianne
- Database ID:
- RTHC-05803
Evidence Hierarchy
Enrolls participants and follows them forward in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Does this mean cannabis is safe during pregnancy?
The authors explicitly state these findings should not be interpreted as suggesting cannabis is safe during pregnancy. The borderline communication signal and the study's limitations mean the question remains open. Longer follow-up is needed.
Why did the communication finding not survive statistical correction?
When testing multiple outcomes (five ASQ-3 domains), the threshold for significance must be raised to account for the increased chance of a false positive. The communication finding met the standard threshold (p = .02) but not the stricter corrected threshold.
Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05803APA
Watts, Dana; Lebel, Catherine; Chaput, Kathleen; Giesbrecht, Gerald F; Dewsnap, Kyle; Baglot, Samantha L; Tomfohr-Madsen, Lianne. (2024). Evaluation of the Association Between Prenatal Cannabis Use and Risk of Developmental Delay.. JAACAP open, 2(4), 250-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.03.004
MLA
Watts, Dana, et al. "Evaluation of the Association Between Prenatal Cannabis Use and Risk of Developmental Delay.." JAACAP open, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.03.004
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Evaluation of the Association Between Prenatal Cannabis Use ..." RTHC-05803. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/watts-2024-evaluation-of-the-association
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.