CHS Remains Frequently Misdiagnosed Despite Being Treatable with Hot Showers and Cannabis Cessation

A review of cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome finds it is frequently misdiagnosed, standard antiemetics are typically ineffective, and hot water bathing provides characteristic symptomatic relief.

Stjepanović, Daniel et al.·Addiction (Abingdon·2025·Preliminary EvidenceReview
RTHC-07729ReviewPreliminary Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Review
Evidence
Preliminary Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

CHS is characterized by cyclical vomiting in chronic cannabis users, is frequently misdiagnosed leading to extensive investigations and delayed treatment, and standard antiemetics are typically ineffective. Hot water bathing/showering is a hallmark symptomatic relief. No standardized treatment protocol exists. Little is known about risk factors for developing CHS.

Key Numbers

Prevalence: probably rare but uncertain. Hot water bathing: characteristic relief. Standard antiemetics: typically ineffective. Cannabis cessation: essential for resolution. No standardized treatment protocol exists.

How They Did This

Narrative review of CHS diagnosis, management, and research gaps.

Why This Research Matters

CHS awareness is growing but misdiagnosis remains common, leading to unnecessary testing, repeated ED visits, and patient suffering. Understanding its unique features can reduce diagnostic delays.

The Bigger Picture

As cannabis use increases, CHS recognition becomes more important for clinicians. The lack of a predictive model for who will develop CHS means all chronic users are potentially at risk.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Narrative review format. CHS prevalence is uncertain. Based largely on case reports. No randomized treatment trials exist. The mechanism of CHS remains poorly understood.

Questions This Raises

  • ?What determines who develops CHS among chronic cannabis users?
  • ?Could biomarkers help predict CHS risk?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Evidence Grade:
Narrative review synthesizing case-based evidence without systematic methodology provides preliminary evidence.
Study Age:
Contemporary review of CHS literature.
Original Title:
Rare but relevant: Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.
Published In:
Addiction (Abingdon, England), 120(2), 380-384 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-07729

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Summarizes existing research on a topic.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you know if it's CHS and not something else?

CHS has distinctive features: cyclical vomiting in chronic cannabis users, relief from hot showers or baths, and failure of standard anti-nausea medications. The diagnosis is often missed because cannabis is not considered as a cause.

Does CHS go away?

Yes, with cannabis cessation. However, symptoms can return if cannabis use resumes. There is currently no way to predict who will develop CHS or how to prevent it.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-07729·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-07729

APA

Stjepanović, Daniel; Kirkman, Julia; Hall, Wayne. (2025). Rare but relevant: Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 120(2), 380-384. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16693

MLA

Stjepanović, Daniel, et al. "Rare but relevant: Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome.." Addiction (Abingdon, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16693

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Rare but relevant: Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome." RTHC-07729. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/stjepanovic-2025-rare-but-relevant-cannabinoid

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.