rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Cannabis Users and Non-Users Responded Differently to Anti-Cannabis Campaign Messages

ObservationalPreliminary evidence
The takeaway

Young adult cannabis users and non-users had different cognitive and emotional responses to two anti-cannabis media campaigns using different message strategies.

public health communicators, cannabis prevention program designers, media campaign evaluators

What the researchers found

The study compared responses to two anti-cannabis campaigns with different message strategies among young adults aged 18-25. Cannabis users and non-users showed differential cognitive and emotional responses, suggesting that one-size-fits-all campaign approaches may not effectively reach the highest-risk population.

Why it matters

With cannabis legalization expanding, effective public health messaging is critical. Understanding how current users vs. non-users respond differently can help design campaigns that actually reach the target audience.

The numbers in context

Young adults aged 18-25. Two anti-cannabis campaigns compared. Cannabis users vs. non-users. Cognitive and emotional responses measured.

How the study worked

Experimental comparison of young adult cannabis users' and non-users' cognitive and emotional responses to two anti-cannabis media campaigns employing different message strategies.

What this study cannot tell us

Experimental setting may not reflect real-world campaign exposure. Self-selected participants. Short-term response measurement. Cannot determine actual behavior change from campaign exposure.

How to read the evidence

Experimental design with relevant comparisons, but limited outcome measures and short-term assessment place at preliminary.

When this study was published

Recent experimental study with young adults.

The bigger picture

The differential responses suggest that campaigns designed to prevent initiation (targeting non-users) may need fundamentally different approaches than campaigns aimed at reducing use among current users.

Questions still open

  • Which campaign strategies are most effective for reducing use among current users?
  • Do these differential responses translate to actual behavior change?

Common questions

Do anti-cannabis campaigns work?
This study suggests they may work differently for users vs. non-users. The same message that resonates with non-users may not be effective for current cannabis users.
What kind of messages work best?
The two campaigns used different strategies, and responses varied by cannabis use status. The study highlights the need for audience-specific messaging rather than one universal approach.

Read the original research

Cannabis Users' and Non-Users' Differential Responses to Two Anti-Cannabis Campaigns.

Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 52(1), 49-60

Citation

Stevens, Elise M; Cohn, Amy; Ruedinger, Brian; Kim, Narae; Seo, Jinhee; Sun, Fuwei; Kim, Seunghyun; Leshner, Glenn. (2025). Cannabis Users' and Non-Users' Differential Responses to Two Anti-Cannabis Campaigns.. Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 52(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981241267879

Explore the wider topic