Four Weeks Without Cannabis Improved Adolescent Brain Function in a Randomized Trial

In a randomized trial of 238 adolescents, those who regularly used cannabis and were incentivized to abstain for four weeks showed improved inhibitory control compared to those who continued using, and performed similarly to non-users by week 4.

Schuster, Randi M et al.·Frontiers in psychiatry·2025·Strong Evidenceclinical-trial
RTHC-07603Clinical TrialStrong Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
clinical-trial
Evidence
Strong Evidence
Sample
N=238

What This Study Found

At baseline, cannabis-using adolescents had worse verbal memory and processing speed than non-users. After four weeks of incentivized abstinence, abstinent cannabis users showed greater improvement in inhibitory control compared to monitoring controls (beta=-10.9, p=0.037) and performed similarly to the non-user group.

Key Numbers

238 adolescents (51% female, 55% White, 18% Black, 9% Asian). 154 cannabis users, 84 non-users. Inhibitory control improvement in abstinence group: beta=-10.9, p=0.037. Abstinent users similar to non-users at week 4. No significant group differences in memory or attention at week 4.

How They Did This

Randomized clinical trial with 238 Greater Boston adolescents (ages 13-19): 154 regular cannabis users randomized to incentivized abstinence or non-contingent monitoring, plus 84 non-users as reference. Weekly cognitive testing over four weeks assessed executive function, memory, and attention.

Why This Research Matters

This is one of the first randomized trials showing that adolescent brains can recover cognitive function relatively quickly after stopping cannabis use. The four-week timeframe is practical and encouraging for both clinicians and young people considering a break from cannabis.

The Bigger Picture

The adolescent brain is still developing, making it potentially more vulnerable to cannabis effects but also more capable of recovery. This study suggests that the cognitive costs of regular adolescent cannabis use are at least partially reversible, which is a more hopeful message than permanent damage narratives.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Contingency management (cash incentives) for abstinence may not reflect real-world motivation. Four weeks may not capture full recovery. No biological verification of complete abstinence. Practice effects from weekly testing could account for some improvement across all groups. Sample was from a single geographic area.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Whether cognitive improvements continue to increase beyond four weeks of abstinence
  • ?Whether heavier or longer-duration cannabis users take longer to recover cognitive function

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Evidence Grade:
Randomized design with non-user reference group and weekly cognitive assessment, providing strong evidence for short-term cognitive recovery.
Study Age:
Published 2025.
Original Title:
Neurocognitive outcomes in adolescents with and without four weeks of cannabis abstinence: a randomized clinical trial using contingency management.
Published In:
Frontiers in psychiatry, 16, 1723633 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-07603

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study
What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this mean cannabis permanently damages teen brains?

This study suggests the opposite: cognitive deficits associated with regular cannabis use in adolescents were at least partially reversible after just four weeks of abstinence. However, the study cannot speak to effects of very heavy or very long-term use.

Why did memory not improve as much as inhibitory control?

The researchers found improvement specifically in inhibitory control (a type of executive function), while memory and attention differences were less clear. Different cognitive domains may recover at different rates, and four weeks may not be enough for full memory recovery.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-07603·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-07603

APA

Schuster, Randi M; Costello, Meghan A; Potter, Kevin; Torquati, Matteo; Gilman, Jodi M; Evins, A Eden. (2025). Neurocognitive outcomes in adolescents with and without four weeks of cannabis abstinence: a randomized clinical trial using contingency management.. Frontiers in psychiatry, 16, 1723633. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1723633

MLA

Schuster, Randi M, et al. "Neurocognitive outcomes in adolescents with and without four weeks of cannabis abstinence: a randomized clinical trial using contingency management.." Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1723633

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Neurocognitive outcomes in adolescents with and without four..." RTHC-07603. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/schuster-2025-neurocognitive-outcomes-in-adolescents

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.