rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Black and Latino participants were less likely to complete a cannabis diversion program in Harris County, Texas

Retrospective CohortStrong evidence
The takeaway

Among 8,323 participants in a Texas cannabis diversion program, African Americans had 22% lower odds and Latino Americans 18% lower odds of program completion compared to White participants, with males overrepresented at 80%.

Criminal justice reformers, cannabis policy makers, and public defenders.

African Americans 22% lower completion; Latinos 18% lower; males 80% of participants

What the researchers found

In Harris County, Texas Marijuana Misdemeanor Diversion Program (2017-2019), African Americans (50% of participants despite ~20% of population) and males (80%) were overrepresented. African Americans had significantly lower odds of program completion (HR 0.782, p<0.001) and longer time to completion. Latino Americans also had lower completion rates (HR 0.822, p=0.003). Failure to complete the program results in greater criminal justice involvement than traditional prosecution.

Why it matters

Diversion programs are designed as progressive alternatives to incarceration. If they systematically disadvantage minorities, they may actually worsen racial disparities, since program failure leads to harsher outcomes than traditional prosecution.

The numbers in context

8,323 participants; 80% male; 50% African American; African American HR 0.782 (p<0.001); Latino HR 0.822 (p=0.003); lower completion and longer time to completion for both groups.

How the study worked

Retrospective analysis of 8,323 MMDP participants (March 2017-July 2019) using Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression to examine gender, age, and race/ethnicity as predictors of completion.

What this study cannot tell us

Single county (Harris County, Texas); cannot determine why completion rates differ (program requirements, access barriers, law enforcement practices); administrative data without socioeconomic covariates; does not assess whether the program is more equitable than prosecution.

How to read the evidence

Strong: large administrative dataset with appropriate regression methods.

When this study was published

Published 2020.

The bigger picture

Cannabis reform is often promoted as a racial justice issue. This study shows that even within "progressive" diversion programs, structural inequities persist. The reasons may include barriers to compliance (transportation, childcare, employment conflicts) that disproportionately affect minorities.

Questions still open

  • What specific program barriers drive lower completion among minorities? Would removing compliance requirements (fees, classes, drug testing) reduce disparities?

Common questions

Are cannabis diversion programs fair across races?
Not in this study. African Americans had 22% lower odds and Latinos 18% lower odds of completing the program compared to White participants. Since failing the program can lead to worse outcomes than traditional prosecution, this disparity has real consequences.
Why are minorities overrepresented in the program?
African Americans were 50% of participants despite being ~20% of the county population. The authors suggest this reflects law enforcement disparities that disproportionately target males and people of color for cannabis possession.

Read the original research

Racial and gender inequities in the implementation of a cannabis criminal justice diversion program in a large and diverse metropolitan county of the USA.

Drug and alcohol dependence, 216, 108316

Citation

Sanchez, Helen F; Orr, Michael F; Wang, Ann; Cano, Miguel Á; Vaughan, Ellen L; Harvey, Laura M; Essa, Saman; Torbati, Autena; Clark, Uraina S; Fagundes, Christopher P; de Dios, Marcel A. (2020). Racial and gender inequities in the implementation of a cannabis criminal justice diversion program in a large and diverse metropolitan county of the USA.. Drug and alcohol dependence, 216, 108316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108316