rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Are Maryland medical marijuana dispensaries concentrated in wealthy, white neighborhoods?

Cross SectionalModerate evidence
The takeaway

An analysis of 85 Maryland dispensaries across 468 zip codes found no evidence that dispensaries were concentrated in high-income or majority-white communities, with dispensaries instead located in racially diverse areas with more retail.

Readers interested in cannabis policy equity, dispensary access, and how legalization intersects with racial and economic justice.

85 dispensaries across 468 zip codes

What the researchers found

Dispensaries were concentrated in zip codes with racially diverse populations and higher concentrations of retail establishments. Community-level racial or income disparities in geographic access to medical cannabis were not observed.

Why it matters

Equity in cannabis legalization is a major policy concern. While Maryland initially awarded a disproportionate share of business licenses to white-owned companies, this study suggests the geographic placement of dispensaries is not concentrated in privileged communities.

The numbers in context

85 dispensaries; 468 zip codes; 6.1 million residents; dispensaries located in racially diverse areas with higher retail density

How the study worked

Ecological cross-sectional design using geocoded locations of 85 operating dispensaries (as of December 2019) from the Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission, linked to zip code demographics from the American Communities Survey covering 6.1 million residents across 468 zip codes.

What this study cannot tell us

Ecological design cannot assess individual-level access. Did not examine affordability, transportation, or other access barriers. Cross-sectional data from a single state.

How to read the evidence

Ecological cross-sectional design with comprehensive geographic coverage, but cannot assess individual-level access or confounders.

When this study was published

Published in 2021 using 2018-2019 data; the dispensary landscape may have changed since.

The bigger picture

Geographic access is only one dimension of equity. Even without location-based disparities, affordability barriers persist since medical cannabis is not covered by insurance. The study examined where dispensaries are, not who can afford to use them.

Questions still open

  • Does geographic proximity to a dispensary translate to actual use across racial and income groups? How do affordability barriers interact with physical access?

Common questions

Were dispensaries placed in wealthy areas?
No. The study found dispensaries were located in racially diverse zip codes with higher retail density, without concentration in high-income or majority-white communities.
Does this mean access is equitable?
Not necessarily. Geographic placement is one factor, but the study did not assess affordability, transportation, or insurance coverage, which all affect who can actually use medical cannabis.

Read the original research

Geolocation of Maryland Medical Marijuana Dispensaries by Community Income and Racial Characteristics: An Ecological Design.

Substance use & misuse, 56(2), 318-326

Citation

Novak, Priscilla; Sanmartin, Maria X; Ali, Mir M. (2021). Geolocation of Maryland Medical Marijuana Dispensaries by Community Income and Racial Characteristics: An Ecological Design.. Substance use & misuse, 56(2), 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2020.1868516