Health Professionals Became the Top Cannabis Information Source as Traditional Media Declined
Between 2017 and 2021, US adults increasingly turned to health professionals for cannabis information (+17% for risk info) while reliance on TV, radio, and newspapers dropped 11-12%.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
In a longitudinal study of 5,053 US adults surveyed at three time points, the use of health professionals as an information source for cannabis risks increased by 17.4%, making it the largest increase among all sources. Traditional media use declined by 11-12%. Cannabis industry sources (advertisements, dispensaries) also increased. Health professionals were consistently rated the most influential information source regardless of age, cannabis use status, or state legalization status.
Key Numbers
5,053 adults across 3 waves; health professional use for risk info: +17.4%; for benefit info: +5.5%; traditional media: -12.3% (benefits), -11.4% (risks); health professionals rated most influential at all time points
How They Did This
Longitudinal study of 5,053 US adults surveyed via web in 2017, 2020, and 2021. Assessed use and perceived influence of multiple cannabis information sources (health professionals, internet, social media, traditional media, family/friends, industry sources). Examined interactions with age, cannabis use, and state legal status.
Why This Research Matters
As people increasingly look to healthcare providers for cannabis guidance, providers need adequate training to offer evidence-based information. The simultaneous rise of industry-sourced information creates competing narratives that providers should be prepared to address.
The Bigger Picture
The shift from passive media consumption to active provider consultation represents an opportunity for the healthcare system to shape public understanding of cannabis, but only if providers are equipped with current, balanced evidence.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Web-based survey may not represent all US adults. Three time points may miss shorter-term fluctuations. Self-reported source usage may not capture passive information exposure. Study period included COVID-19 pandemic, which may have affected information-seeking behavior.
Questions This Raises
- ?Are healthcare providers adequately trained to discuss cannabis risks and benefits?
- ?How does increasing industry-source exposure affect risk perception?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Evidence Grade:
- Strong: longitudinal design with three waves, large national sample, and analysis of multiple moderators.
- Study Age:
- 2025 publication with data from 2017-2021
- Original Title:
- Changes in Sources of Information About the Risks and Benefits of Cannabis in a National Cohort of U.S. Adults From 2017 to 2021.
- Published In:
- Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 86(4), 563-570 (2025)
- Authors:
- Graham, Francis Julian L(3), Keyhani, Salomeh(22), Ling, Pamela(3), Pravosud, Vira, Nguyen, Nhung, Hasin, Deborah S, Cohen, Beth E
- Database ID:
- RTHC-06581
Evidence Hierarchy
Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06581APA
Graham, Francis Julian L; Keyhani, Salomeh; Ling, Pamela; Pravosud, Vira; Nguyen, Nhung; Hasin, Deborah S; Cohen, Beth E. (2025). Changes in Sources of Information About the Risks and Benefits of Cannabis in a National Cohort of U.S. Adults From 2017 to 2021.. Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 86(4), 563-570. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00108
MLA
Graham, Francis Julian L, et al. "Changes in Sources of Information About the Risks and Benefits of Cannabis in a National Cohort of U.S. Adults From 2017 to 2021.." Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2025. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.24-00108
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Changes in Sources of Information About the Risks and Benefi..." RTHC-06581. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/graham-2025-changes-in-sources-of
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.