Pregnant People Avoid Telling Providers About Cannabis Use Due to Fear of Judgment and Reporting
In interviews with 34 pregnant or recently pregnant cannabis users, most said providers never asked about cannabis, and those who used it feared being reported to child welfare if they disclosed.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Most of the 34 interview participants reported that healthcare providers never initiated conversations about cannabis use. Participants distrusted providers as accurate cannabis information sources, viewing provider messaging as unfairly grouping cannabis with alcohol and harder drugs. Fear of judgment and child welfare reporting were the primary barriers to disclosure. Many used cannabis for medical reasons but rarely experienced providers discussing risks versus benefits of cannabis compared to alternative treatments.
Key Numbers
34 interview participants; most reported no provider-initiated cannabis discussions; few disclosed use voluntarily; primary barriers: distrust of provider information, fear of judgment, fear of child welfare reporting
How They Did This
Qualitative study with in-depth interviews of 34 individuals who were pregnant or had been pregnant within the past two years and who used cannabis before or during pregnancy. Interviews explored experiences with and perspectives on provider communication about cannabis.
Why This Research Matters
When patients hide substance use from providers, it creates blind spots in prenatal care. This study reveals the specific trust barriers that prevent open communication, pointing to opportunities for more effective clinical approaches.
The Bigger Picture
The gap between public perception of cannabis (as relatively benign) and clinical messaging (grouping it with harmful drugs) creates a communication breakdown that affects prenatal care quality. Resolving this requires providers to engage with patient perspectives rather than simply issuing warnings.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Small qualitative sample cannot be generalized to all pregnant cannabis users. Participants were recruited in areas where cannabis was legal, which may affect attitudes. Self-selection bias likely.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would a risk-benefit conversation framework increase disclosure rates?
- ?How do child welfare reporting policies affect prenatal cannabis screening?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Evidence Grade:
- Preliminary: small qualitative study capturing perspectives of a self-selected group.
- Study Age:
- 2025 publication
- Original Title:
- Mistrust Limits Possibilities for Patient-Provider Discussions Regarding Cannabis Use During Pregnancy.
- Published In:
- Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, 35(6), 450-457 (2025)
- Authors:
- Gould, Heather, Zaugg, Claudia, Scott, Karen A, Roberts, Sarah C M
- Database ID:
- RTHC-06572
Evidence Hierarchy
Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06572APA
Gould, Heather; Zaugg, Claudia; Scott, Karen A; Roberts, Sarah C M. (2025). Mistrust Limits Possibilities for Patient-Provider Discussions Regarding Cannabis Use During Pregnancy.. Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, 35(6), 450-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2025.09.002
MLA
Gould, Heather, et al. "Mistrust Limits Possibilities for Patient-Provider Discussions Regarding Cannabis Use During Pregnancy.." Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2025.09.002
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Mistrust Limits Possibilities for Patient-Provider Discussio..." RTHC-06572. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/gould-2025-mistrust-limits-possibilities-for
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.