Cannabis use frequency did not increase among 18-20 year olds in LA after recreational legalization, except for edibles

Comparing young cannabis users before and after California's legalization, overall frequency did not increase, but edible consumption rose significantly.

Fedorova, Ekaterina V et al.·Journal of psychoactive drugs·2025·Moderate EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-06441Cross SectionalModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
N=172

What This Study Found

Frequency of cannabis use (days or hits per day) did not significantly differ between cohorts. Edible use increased post-legalization. Medical patients reported more medical use, more concentrate use, and perceived cannabis as more addictive.

Key Numbers

Pre-AUL: n=172. Post-AUL: n=139. Use frequency unchanged. Edible use increased. Medical patients had more concentrate use and perceived addiction risk.

How They Did This

Two cohorts of 18-20 year old cannabis users in LA: pre-legalization (2014-15, n=172) and post-legalization (2019-20, n=139), assessed for 90-day use.

Why This Research Matters

For 18-20 year olds who cannot legally purchase recreational cannabis, legalization did not drive increased consumption, challenging assumptions about normalization effects.

The Bigger Picture

The shift toward edibles reflects changing product availability rather than increased overall consumption.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Different cohorts, not longitudinal. Small samples. LA-specific. Only existing cannabis users studied.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Has edible use continued rising?
  • ?Do these patterns hold for cannabis-naive young adults?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Cannabis use frequency unchanged post-legalization; only edible use increased
Evidence Grade:
Repeat cross-sectional with similar methods, but different cohorts and small samples limit conclusions.
Study Age:
Published in 2025, data 2014-15 and 2019-20.
Original Title:
Pre-Post Cannabis Legalization for Adult Use: A Trend Study of Two Cohorts of Young Adult Cannabis Users in Los Angeles.
Published In:
Journal of psychoactive drugs, 57(1), 99-109 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06441

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Did legalization increase cannabis use among young adults?

Not in this LA study. Overall frequency stayed stable; the main change was more edible use.

Were medical patients different?

Yes. They reported more medical use, higher concentrate use, and viewed cannabis as more addictive.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06441·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06441

APA

Fedorova, Ekaterina V; Mitchel, Allison; Finkelstein, Maddy; Ataiants, Janna; Wong, Carolyn F; Conn, Bridgid M; Lankenau, Stephen E. (2025). Pre-Post Cannabis Legalization for Adult Use: A Trend Study of Two Cohorts of Young Adult Cannabis Users in Los Angeles.. Journal of psychoactive drugs, 57(1), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2023.2282515

MLA

Fedorova, Ekaterina V, et al. "Pre-Post Cannabis Legalization for Adult Use: A Trend Study of Two Cohorts of Young Adult Cannabis Users in Los Angeles.." Journal of psychoactive drugs, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2023.2282515

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Pre-Post Cannabis Legalization for Adult Use: A Trend Study ..." RTHC-06441. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/fedorova-2025-prepost-cannabis-legalization-for

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.