Five years after Canadian legalization, social acceptance grew but so did perceived risks of cannabis

In a 5-year longitudinal study following Canadian legalization, social acceptability of recreational cannabis use increased over time, but so did perceived health risks including addiction potential and links to anxiety, depression, and sleep disruption, with non-users showing the steepest attitude shifts.

Doggett, Amanda et al.·The International journal on drug policy·2025·Moderate EvidenceLongitudinal Cohort
RTHC-06359Longitudinal CohortModerate Evidence2025RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Longitudinal Cohort
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Social acceptability of any recreational use (OR 1.06) and trying cannabis (OR 1.02) increased over time. But perceived riskiness of regular use also increased (OR 0.97), along with perceived addiction potential (OR 0.94). Perceived health benefits decreased while perceived risks increased (exacerbating stress, anxiety, depression; disrupting sleep). Non-users before legalization showed the steepest increases in social acceptability but smaller increases in risk perception.

Key Numbers

Mean 9.9 assessment waves per participant over 5 years. Social acceptability of recreational use: OR 1.06 per wave. Medical use acceptability decreased: OR 0.95. Regular use perceived as riskier: OR 0.97. Addiction risk perceived as greater: OR 0.94. 48% reported pre-legalization cannabis use.

How They Did This

Longitudinal observational cohort (60% female, median age 29, 48% pre-legalization users) assessed up to 11 times from September 2018 to October 2023. Measures included social acceptability of various use patterns, perceived risks and benefits, and moderation by pre-legalization use status.

Why This Research Matters

A major concern about legalization is that it will normalize cannabis and reduce perceived risks, leading to greater misuse. This study shows a more nuanced picture: while social acceptance grew, Canadians simultaneously became more aware of specific health risks, suggesting that post-legalization public health education may be working.

The Bigger Picture

The simultaneous increase in acceptance and risk perception is encouraging from a public health perspective. It suggests Canadians are developing more sophisticated attitudes: accepting cannabis use as a personal choice while becoming more informed about its health risks. The decrease in perceived medical cannabis benefits may reflect growing awareness that evidence for many medical claims is limited.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cohort may not be nationally representative (convenience sample, 60% female, median age 29). Attrition could bias results if participants with changing attitudes were more likely to drop out. Self-reported attitudes may not reflect behavior. The 5-year window may not capture longer-term shifts.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Will risk perceptions continue to increase, or will they plateau?
  • ?Are shifting attitudes translating into changed behavior?
  • ?Why did perceived medical cannabis benefits decrease?
  • ?Will non-users who became more accepting eventually become users?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
Social acceptance of cannabis increased but so did perceived risks for anxiety, depression, and addiction
Evidence Grade:
Longitudinal cohort with up to 11 assessments over 5 years providing robust within-person change data, though convenience sampling limits generalizability.
Study Age:
Published in 2025, covering September 2018 to October 2023.
Original Title:
Changes in cannabis attitudes and perceptions in the five years following recreational legalization in Canada: Findings from an observational cohort study of community adults.
Published In:
The International journal on drug policy, 140, 104782 (2025)
Database ID:
RTHC-06359

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-ControlFollows or compares groups over time
This study
Cross-Sectional / Observational
Case Report / Animal Study

Follows a group of people over time to track how outcomes develop.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Did legalization make Canadians think cannabis is safe?

No. While social acceptability increased, perceived health risks also grew. Canadians became more likely to view cannabis as acceptable while simultaneously recognizing risks like addiction, anxiety, depression, and sleep disruption.

Did attitudes change differently for users versus non-users?

Yes. People who did not use cannabis before legalization showed the steepest increases in social acceptability, suggesting legalization most affected the attitudes of non-users rather than existing users.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-06359·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-06359

APA

Doggett, Amanda; Belisario, Kyla L; McDonald, André J; De Jesus, Jane; Vandehei, Emily; Gillard, Jessica; Lee, Laura; MacKillop, James. (2025). Changes in cannabis attitudes and perceptions in the five years following recreational legalization in Canada: Findings from an observational cohort study of community adults.. The International journal on drug policy, 140, 104782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104782

MLA

Doggett, Amanda, et al. "Changes in cannabis attitudes and perceptions in the five years following recreational legalization in Canada: Findings from an observational cohort study of community adults.." The International journal on drug policy, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104782

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Changes in cannabis attitudes and perceptions in the five ye..." RTHC-06359. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/doggett-2025-changes-in-cannabis-attitudes

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.