States with cannabis laws saw lower benzodiazepine use but higher antidepressant prescriptions

Medical and recreational cannabis laws were associated with a 12-15% reduction in benzodiazepine fills but increases in antidepressant and antipsychotic prescriptions among commercially insured patients.

Bradford, Ashley C et al.·JAMA network open·2024·Moderate EvidenceCross-Sectional
RTHC-05155Cross SectionalModerate Evidence2024RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Cross-Sectional
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
Not reported

What This Study Found

Medical cannabis laws were associated with a 12.4% reduction in benzodiazepine fill rates, and recreational laws with a 15.2% reduction. Meanwhile, medical cannabis laws were associated with a 3.8% increase in antidepressant fills, and medical dispensary openings with an 8.8% increase.

Key Numbers

3.85 million patients in the primary benzodiazepine sample. 12.4% reduction in benzo fill rate with medical cannabis laws. 15.2% reduction with recreational laws. 3.8% increase in antidepressant fills with medical laws. 8.8% increase with medical dispensary openings. 65.4% of the benzodiazepine sample were women.

How They Did This

Cross-sectional analysis of 10 million commercially insured patients from 2007-2020 using Optum claims data. A synthetic control method compared prescribing patterns across states with different cannabis policy timelines, examining medical/recreational laws and dispensary openings.

Why This Research Matters

The finding that cannabis laws may shift prescribing patterns away from benzodiazepines (which carry overdose risk) while increasing antidepressant use suggests cannabis policy may have complex, drug-class-specific effects on mental health treatment.

The Bigger Picture

This adds to growing evidence that cannabis legalization does not simply add substance use on top of existing medication patterns. Instead, it appears to reshape prescribing in ways that vary by drug class, potentially reflecting substitution effects or changes in how patients and clinicians approach mental health treatment.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cross-sectional design cannot establish causation. Commercially insured patients may not represent Medicaid or uninsured populations. The study cannot determine whether patients who reduced benzodiazepine use actually substituted cannabis. State-level heterogeneity was substantial.

Questions This Raises

  • ?Are patients actively substituting cannabis for benzodiazepines, or are clinicians prescribing differently?
  • ?Why did antidepressant prescriptions increase with cannabis laws?
  • ?Do these prescribing shifts translate to better or worse patient outcomes?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
12.4% reduction in benzodiazepine fills with medical cannabis laws
Evidence Grade:
Large dataset of 10 million patients with synthetic control methodology, though the cross-sectional design limits causal conclusions and state-level variation was considerable.
Study Age:
Published in 2024 in JAMA Network Open, covering data through 2020.
Original Title:
Cannabis Laws and Utilization of Medications for the Treatment of Mental Health Disorders.
Published In:
JAMA network open, 7(9), e2432021 (2024)
Database ID:
RTHC-05155

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

A snapshot of a population at one point in time.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

Did cannabis laws reduce all psychiatric medication use?

No. Benzodiazepine fills decreased, but antidepressant and antipsychotic fills increased. The effects varied by drug class, suggesting cannabis policy does not uniformly reduce psychiatric prescribing.

Does this mean people are replacing benzos with cannabis?

The study found an association but cannot confirm direct substitution. Other explanations include changes in clinician prescribing behavior or shifts in how patients seek mental health treatment after cannabis becomes available.

How large was this study?

It analyzed data from over 10 million commercially insured patients across the US from 2007 to 2020, making it one of the largest studies on cannabis policy and prescription medication patterns.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-05155·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05155

APA

Bradford, Ashley C; Lozano-Rojas, Felipe; Shone, Hailemichael Bekele; Bradford, W David; Abraham, Amanda J. (2024). Cannabis Laws and Utilization of Medications for the Treatment of Mental Health Disorders.. JAMA network open, 7(9), e2432021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32021

MLA

Bradford, Ashley C, et al. "Cannabis Laws and Utilization of Medications for the Treatment of Mental Health Disorders.." JAMA network open, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32021

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Cannabis Laws and Utilization of Medications for the Treatme..." RTHC-05155. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/bradford-2024-cannabis-laws-and-utilization

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.