rethinkTHC Search
Menu
Study breakdown

Cannabis Education Campaigns in Northern Canada Had Modest Effects on Risk Perception

Cross SectionalModerate evidence
The takeaway

About 40% of residents in Canada's northern territories noticed cannabis education campaigns after legalization, and those who did had slightly higher perceptions of cannabis risk.

Public health officials, cannabis policy researchers, and health communicators

40% of northern Canadians noticed cannabis education campaigns

What the researchers found

Noticing cannabis education campaigns was associated with a 9% increase in perceiving daily cannabis smoking and vaping as moderate-to-high risk. The effect did not differ by age group or cannabis use frequency. However, awareness was lower among people with lower education and income.

Why it matters

Cannabis legalization in Canada was accompanied by public health campaigns about risks. This study is one of the first to examine whether those campaigns actually reached people and shifted perceptions, particularly in remote northern communities.

The numbers in context

40.4% of respondents noticed cannabis education campaigns. Adjusted risk ratio for perceiving daily cannabis smoking as risky: 1.09 (95% CI: 1.02-1.16). Same for daily vaping: 1.09 (95% CI: 1.02-1.16). No significant effect on edible or secondhand smoke risk perceptions.

How the study worked

Cross-sectional survey of 2,452 participants aged 16+ in Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut. Poisson regression with robust standard errors estimated associations between campaign awareness and risk perceptions, adjusting for sociodemographic factors and cannabis use frequency.

What this study cannot tell us

Cross-sectional design cannot establish whether campaigns caused the higher risk perceptions. People who notice campaigns may already be more health-conscious. The study was limited to Canada's three territories, which have unique demographics.

How to read the evidence

Reasonably large sample with appropriate statistical methods, but cross-sectional design limits causal inference.

When this study was published

2024 study

The bigger picture

A 9% increase in risk perception is modest. The finding that campaigns reached fewer people with lower education and income raises equity concerns, as these groups may be more vulnerable to cannabis-related harms.

Questions still open

  • What types of cannabis education campaigns are most effective? How can campaigns better reach populations with lower education and income? Do risk perception changes actually translate to behavior change?

Common questions

Do cannabis education campaigns actually change how people think about risk?
Slightly. In this study, people who noticed campaigns were about 9% more likely to perceive daily cannabis use as risky, but the effect was modest.
Who is least likely to see cannabis education campaigns?
People with lower education and income were less likely to notice campaigns, raising concerns about equity in public health messaging.

Read the original research

Associations between noticing public health education campaigns about cannabis and risk perceptions in the northern Canadian territories: a cross-sectional study.

Health education research, 39(6), 507-517

Citation

Schwartz, Naomi; Poon, Theresa; Hammond, David; Hobin, Erin. (2024). Associations between noticing public health education campaigns about cannabis and risk perceptions in the northern Canadian territories: a cross-sectional study.. Health education research, 39(6), 507-517. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyae021