Marijuana Smoke Contains Some Chemicals at Higher Levels Than Tobacco Smoke
Systematic comparison found marijuana smoke contained up to 20 times more ammonia and 3-5 times more hydrogen cyanide and nitric oxide than tobacco smoke, though some carcinogens were lower.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Researchers prepared marijuana and tobacco cigarettes identically and analyzed their smoke under two standardized smoking conditions, comparing both mainstream (inhaled) and sidestream (environmental) smoke.
Mainstream marijuana smoke contained ammonia at levels up to 20-fold higher than tobacco. Hydrogen cyanide, nitric oxide, and certain aromatic amines were found at 3-5 times higher concentrations in marijuana smoke.
However, some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), known carcinogens, were actually lower in mainstream marijuana smoke compared to tobacco. The pattern reversed for sidestream smoke, where marijuana had higher PAH concentrations.
The overall composition was qualitatively similar between marijuana and tobacco smoke, meaning they contained the same types of chemicals, but in different quantities.
Key Numbers
Ammonia: up to 20x higher in marijuana smoke. Hydrogen cyanide, NO, NOx, aromatic amines: 3-5x higher in marijuana. PAHs: lower in mainstream marijuana but higher in sidestream marijuana smoke.
How They Did This
Marijuana and tobacco cigarettes were prepared identically and machine-smoked under two standardized conditions. Both mainstream and sidestream smoke were analyzed for the complete suite of chemicals routinely tested in tobacco smoke, including ammonia, hydrogen cyanide, nitrogen oxides, aromatic amines, and PAHs.
Why This Research Matters
While tobacco smoke chemistry is extensively documented, marijuana smoke had received limited analysis. This systematic comparison provided the first comprehensive side-by-side data, revealing both reassuring findings (lower PAHs in mainstream smoke) and concerning ones (much higher ammonia and HCN).
The Bigger Picture
This study helped move the conversation about marijuana smoke health risks from assumption to data. The finding that marijuana smoke is not simply "the same as tobacco smoke" but has its own distinct chemical profile is relevant for public health communication.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Machine smoking may not replicate human smoking behavior (marijuana users typically inhale more deeply and hold longer). The study analyzed chemicals but did not measure health outcomes. Marijuana cigarette composition varies widely in the real world.
Questions This Raises
- ?Do the higher ammonia and HCN levels in marijuana smoke translate to measurable respiratory harm?
- ?Does the typical marijuana smoking pattern (deeper inhalation, longer breath-holding) amplify exposure to these chemicals?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Marijuana smoke: 20x more ammonia, 3-5x more HCN than tobacco smoke
- Evidence Grade:
- This is a well-controlled laboratory analysis comparing standardized cigarettes under consistent conditions, providing moderate evidence about smoke chemistry (though not health outcomes).
- Study Age:
- Published in 2008. This study is frequently cited in discussions of marijuana smoke health risks. The rise of vaporization and edible consumption has since reduced reliance on smoking for many users.
- Original Title:
- A comparison of mainstream and sidestream marijuana and tobacco cigarette smoke produced under two machine smoking conditions.
- Published In:
- Chemical research in toxicology, 21(2), 494-502 (2008)
- Authors:
- Moir, David, Rickert, William S, Levasseur, Genevieve, Larose, Yolande, Maertens, Rebecca, White, Paul, Desjardins, Suzanne
- Database ID:
- RTHC-00320
Evidence Hierarchy
A snapshot of a population at one point in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
Is marijuana smoke safer than tobacco smoke?
This study showed it's not a simple comparison. Marijuana smoke had higher levels of some harmful chemicals (ammonia, HCN) but lower levels of others (some PAHs). The different smoking patterns also matter. Neither can be considered "safe" to inhale.
Does vaporizing avoid these chemicals?
Vaporization heats cannabis below combustion temperature, which should avoid producing most combustion byproducts like ammonia, HCN, and PAHs. However, vaporizer emissions have their own chemical profiles that are still being characterized.
Read More on RethinkTHC
- cannabis-cardiovascular-heart-risk-stroke
- cannabis-heart-cardiovascular-risk
- coughing-up-stuff-after-quitting-weed
- lung-recovery-after-quitting-smoking-weed
- lung-recovery-quitting-weed
- quitting-weed-female-hormones
- quitting-weed-weight-gain-loss-diet-appetite
- sex-after-quitting-weed
- weed-DUI-driving-impaired-cannabis-laws
- weed-acne-skin
- weed-fertility-sperm
- weed-gut-digestion-problems
- weed-heart-health
- weed-testosterone-levels
- blunts-vs-joints-vs-spliffs-difference
- how-to-tell-if-weed-is-moldy
- dry-herb-vape-vs-oil-vape-vs-disposable
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-00320APA
Moir, David; Rickert, William S; Levasseur, Genevieve; Larose, Yolande; Maertens, Rebecca; White, Paul; Desjardins, Suzanne. (2008). A comparison of mainstream and sidestream marijuana and tobacco cigarette smoke produced under two machine smoking conditions.. Chemical research in toxicology, 21(2), 494-502.
MLA
Moir, David, et al. "A comparison of mainstream and sidestream marijuana and tobacco cigarette smoke produced under two machine smoking conditions.." Chemical research in toxicology, 2008.
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "A comparison of mainstream and sidestream marijuana and toba..." RTHC-00320. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/moir-2008-a-comparison-of-mainstream
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.