Peer approval was a stronger predictor of driving after using alcohol and cannabis together than seeing others do it

Among nearly 2,000 young adults in Washington State, perceived peer approval of driving after combined alcohol and cannabis use predicted DUI behavior more strongly than simply believing peers did it.

Hultgren, Brittney A et al.·Alcohol·2024·Moderate EvidenceObservational
RTHC-05389ObservationalModerate Evidence2024RETHINKTHC RESEARCH DATABASErethinkthc.com/research

Quick Facts

Study Type
Observational
Evidence
Moderate Evidence
Sample
N=1,941

What This Study Found

DUI after simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use (DUI-SAM) was reported by 2.7% and riding with an impaired driver (RWI-SAM) by 5.3%. Nearly half of participants overestimated how often peers drove impaired. After controlling for frequency of use and descriptive norms, perceived peer approval (injunctive norms) was significantly associated with all DUI and RWI behaviors.

Key Numbers

1,941 participants; 2.7% DUI-SAM; 5.3% RWI-SAM; 49.8% believed average young adult drove after SAM use at least monthly; 68.8% called DUI-SAM totally unacceptable; injunctive norms significantly predicted all DUI/RWI behaviors

How They Did This

Cross-sectional survey of 1,941 young adults (ages 18-25) from the 2019 cohort of the Washington Young Adult Health Survey. Logistic regression models assessed associations between descriptive norms, injunctive norms, and past-month DUI/RWI behaviors with post-stratification weighting.

Why This Research Matters

Identifying that peer approval matters more than perceived prevalence for driving under combined substances points to a specific, actionable target for prevention campaigns.

The Bigger Picture

Prevention efforts often focus on correcting misperceptions about how common a behavior is. This study suggests that for impaired driving after combined substance use, changing perceived approval may be more effective.

What This Study Doesn't Tell Us

Cross-sectional design cannot establish causality; self-reported DUI likely underestimated; single state sample; 2019 data predates pandemic; cannot distinguish between types of cannabis products used

Questions This Raises

  • ?Would social norms campaigns specifically targeting approval of SAM-impaired driving reduce these behaviors?
  • ?Do injunctive norms operate differently for single-substance versus polysubstance impaired driving?

Trust & Context

Key Stat:
49.8% overestimated peer SAM-impaired driving
Evidence Grade:
Large statewide survey with appropriate statistical methods, but cross-sectional design limits causal inference.
Study Age:
2024 publication with 2019 survey data
Original Title:
Young adult impaired driving behaviors and perceived norms of driving under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use.
Published In:
Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 48(12), 2319-2330 (2024)
Database ID:
RTHC-05389

Evidence Hierarchy

Meta-Analysis / Systematic Review
Randomized Controlled Trial
Cohort / Case-Control
Cross-Sectional / ObservationalSnapshot without intervening
This study
Case Report / Animal Study

Watches what happens naturally without intervening.

What do these levels mean? →

Frequently Asked Questions

What matters more for preventing impaired driving: what people think peers do or what they think peers approve of?

This study found that perceived peer approval (injunctive norms) was a stronger predictor of driving after combined alcohol and cannabis use than beliefs about how often peers did it (descriptive norms). This suggests prevention campaigns should focus on communicating that most young adults find this behavior unacceptable.

How common were misperceptions about peer DUI?

Nearly half (49.8%) of young adults believed the average person their age drove after using alcohol and cannabis together at least once a month. In reality, only 2.7% reported doing so, revealing a large gap between perceived and actual behavior.

Read More on RethinkTHC

Cite This Study

RTHC-05389·https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-05389

APA

Hultgren, Brittney A; Delawalla, Miranda L M; Szydlowski, Victoria; Guttmannova, Katarina; Cadigan, Jennifer M; Kilmer, Jason R; Lee, Christine M; Larimer, Mary E. (2024). Young adult impaired driving behaviors and perceived norms of driving under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use.. Alcohol, clinical & experimental research, 48(12), 2319-2330. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15459

MLA

Hultgren, Brittney A, et al. "Young adult impaired driving behaviors and perceived norms of driving under the influence of simultaneous alcohol and cannabis use.." Alcohol, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.15459

RethinkTHC

RethinkTHC Research Database. "Young adult impaired driving behaviors and perceived norms o..." RTHC-05389. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/hultgren-2024-young-adult-impaired-driving

Access the Original Study

Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.

This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.