Finger-to-Nose Test Is the Best Single Indicator of Cannabis Impairment in Roadside Evaluations
Among Drug Recognition Expert evaluation tests, the finger-to-nose test with 3+ misses was the single best predictor of cannabis impairment (87%+ accuracy), and combining four tests achieved over 96% accuracy.
Quick Facts
What This Study Found
Law enforcement uses the Drug Evaluation and Classification Program (DECP) to assess suspected drug-impaired drivers, but the reliability of specific tests for detecting cannabis impairment has been uncertain. This study compared 302 toxicologically confirmed cannabis-impaired drivers against 302 non-impaired controls.
The finger-to-nose test stood out as the single best predictor, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value all above 87% when using 3 or more misses as the criterion. Eyelid tremors during the Modified Romberg Balance test also performed well (all metrics above 86%).
Combining at least 2 of 4 indicators (finger-to-nose misses, eyelid tremors, one-leg-stand clues, walk-and-turn clues) produced the strongest results, with all diagnostic characteristics above 96.7%.
Notably, the commonly debated 5 ug/L blood THC cutoff showed limited relevance. There were no significant differences in impairment indicators between drivers above and below this threshold.
Key Numbers
Finger-to-nose test (3+ misses): all diagnostic metrics 87.1%+. Eyelid tremors: all metrics 86.1%+. Combined 2-of-4 criteria: all metrics 96.7%+. 302 confirmed cases vs. 302 controls. 5 ug/L THC cutoff showed no significant diagnostic value.
How They Did This
Retrospective analysis of 302 toxicologically confirmed cannabis-only DECP cases (blood THC 1+ ug/L) compared to 302 normative non-impaired controls. Evaluated pulse, blood pressure, pupil size, and performance on four psychophysical tests.
Why This Research Matters
Unlike alcohol, there is no agreed-upon standard for cannabis impairment testing. This study provides the strongest evidence to date for which specific roadside tests reliably identify cannabis impairment, and it challenges the usefulness of blood THC concentration cutoffs.
The Bigger Picture
As cannabis legalization expands, law enforcement needs validated tools for identifying impaired drivers. This study strengthens the evidence base for behavioral assessment over blood THC levels, which decline rapidly and correlate poorly with impairment.
What This Study Doesn't Tell Us
Cases were selected where Drug Recognition Experts successfully identified cannabis, potentially excluding cases where cannabis impairment was missed. The comparison to normative data rather than a matched control group introduces potential confounds. Polydrug cases were excluded.
Questions This Raises
- ?Would these tests perform as well in the field as in this analysis?
- ?How should these findings influence per se THC driving laws?
- ?Could automated or technology-assisted versions of these tests improve consistency?
Trust & Context
- Key Stat:
- Combined behavioral tests achieved 96.7%+ accuracy for cannabis impairment
- Evidence Grade:
- Large sample with toxicological confirmation and systematic analysis of multiple diagnostic characteristics, though case selection may introduce bias.
- Study Age:
- Published in 2016. Cannabis potency and product diversity have increased, which may affect impairment patterns.
- Original Title:
- Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) examination characteristics of cannabis impairment.
- Published In:
- Accident; analysis and prevention, 92, 219-29 (2016)
- Authors:
- Hartman, Rebecca L(3), Richman, Jack E, Hayes, Charles E, Huestis, Marilyn A
- Database ID:
- RTHC-01171
Evidence Hierarchy
A snapshot of a population at one point in time.
What do these levels mean? →Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best roadside test for cannabis impairment?
The finger-to-nose test with 3 or more misses was the single best predictor (87%+ accuracy). Combining it with eyelid tremors, one-leg-stand, and walk-and-turn tests achieved over 96% accuracy.
Does blood THC level predict impairment?
This study found no significant differences in impairment indicators between drivers with blood THC above and below the commonly debated 5 ug/L cutoff, suggesting blood levels are not a reliable impairment measure.
Read More on RethinkTHC
Cite This Study
https://rethinkthc.com/research/RTHC-01171APA
Hartman, Rebecca L; Richman, Jack E; Hayes, Charles E; Huestis, Marilyn A. (2016). Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) examination characteristics of cannabis impairment.. Accident; analysis and prevention, 92, 219-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.012
MLA
Hartman, Rebecca L, et al. "Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) examination characteristics of cannabis impairment.." Accident; analysis and prevention, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.012
RethinkTHC
RethinkTHC Research Database. "Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) examination characteristics of..." RTHC-01171. Retrieved from https://rethinkthc.com/research/hartman-2016-drug-recognition-expert-dre
Access the Original Study
Study data sourced from PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
This study breakdown was produced by the RethinkTHC research team. We analyze and report published research findings without making health recommendations. All interpretations are based solely on the published abstract and study data.